Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Apr;44(4):449-463.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5086-z. Epub 2018 Mar 2.

Fluid therapy in neurointensive care patients: ESICM consensus and clinical practice recommendations

Affiliations
Review

Fluid therapy in neurointensive care patients: ESICM consensus and clinical practice recommendations

Mauro Oddo et al. Intensive Care Med. 2018 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To report the ESICM consensus and clinical practice recommendations on fluid therapy in neurointensive care patients.

Design: A consensus committee comprising 22 international experts met in October 2016 during ESICM LIVES2016. Teleconferences and electronic-based discussions between the members of the committee subsequently served to discuss and develop the consensus process.

Methods: Population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) questions were reviewed and updated as needed, and evidence profiles generated. The consensus focused on three main topics: (1) general fluid resuscitation and maintenance in neurointensive care patients, (2) hyperosmolar fluids for intracranial pressure control, (3) fluid management in delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid haemorrhage. After an extensive literature search, the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system were applied to assess the quality of evidence (from high to very low), to formulate treatment recommendations as strong or weak, and to issue best practice statements when applicable. A modified Delphi process based on the integration of evidence provided by the literature and expert opinions-using a sequential approach to avoid biases and misinterpretations-was used to generate the final consensus statement.

Results: The final consensus comprises a total of 32 statements, including 13 strong recommendations and 17 weak recommendations. No recommendations were provided for two statements.

Conclusions: We present a consensus statement and clinical practice recommendations on fluid therapy for neurointensive care patients.

Keywords: Evidence‐based medicine; Fluid therapy; Guidelines; Hypertonic; Intracerebral haemorrhage; Mannitol; Neurointensive care; Stroke; Subarachnoid haemorrhage; Traumatic brain injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Stroke. 2013 Aug;44(8):2155-61 - PubMed
    1. J Neurosurg. 1984 Oct;61(4):700-6 - PubMed
    1. J Neurosurg. 2005 Jul;103(1):25-30 - PubMed
    1. Neurocrit Care. 2014 Dec;21(3):462-9 - PubMed
    1. J Trauma. 1997 May;42(5 Suppl):S61-5 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources