Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 3;8(3):e020398.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020398.

Factors influencing career progress for early stage clinician-scientists in emerging Asian academic medical centres: a qualitative study in Singapore

Affiliations

Factors influencing career progress for early stage clinician-scientists in emerging Asian academic medical centres: a qualitative study in Singapore

Sungwon Yoon et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the factors that influence career progress for early stage clinician-scientists and to identify ways to mitigate these factors in the context of emerging Asian academic medical centres (AMCs).

Design: Qualitative interviews and thematic data analysis based on grounded theory.

Setting and participants: Five focus group interviews comprising 29 early career clinician-scientists who have received their first national-level career development award in Singapore.

Results: Clinical priorities represented an overarching concern with many reporting the difficulty in delineating responsibilities between clinical care and research. Additionally, there was a prevailing perception of the lack of support for research at the institutional level. Participants tended to identify mentors through their own efforts in a relatively haphazard manner, often owing to the dearth of role models and perceived inadequacy of reward systems for mentoring. Support from mentors was thought to be limited in terms of targeted scientific guidance and long-term commitments to the relationship. Most of the participants expressed concerns about how they could secure the next level of funding with diminishing confidence. Notably, the work-life balance was neither conceptualised as a 'barrier' to successful pursuit of research career nor was it translated into the reason for leaving the dual clinical-research career pathway.

Conclusions: Results revealed specific limitations presented by the research environment in newly emerging Asian AMCs. To retain a vibrant clinician-scientist workforce, additional measures are needed, aiming to improve institutional culture of research, build mentoring networks, adopt effective tools for tracking career progress and provide a clear and viable career progression path for clinician-scientist. Further research might explore the cross-cultural differences in managing work-life balance in academic medicine.

Keywords: qualitative research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of study process

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. National Academy of Science. Bridges to independence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2005.
    1. National Academy of Science. Addressing the nation’s changing needs for biomedical and behavioral scientists. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2000. - PubMed
    1. Wyngaarden JB. The clinical investigator as an endangered species. N Engl J Med 1979;301:1254–9. 10.1056/NEJM197912063012303 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ley TJ, Rosenberg LE. The physician-scientist career pipeline in 2005: build it, and they will come. JAMA 2005;294:1343–51. 10.1001/jama.294.11.1343 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schafer AI. The vanishing physician-scientist? Transl Res 2010;155:1–2. 10.1016/j.trsl.2009.09.006 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources