A Successful Pharmacist-Based Quality Initiative to Reduce Inappropriate Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis Use in an Academic Medical Intensive Care Unit
- PMID: 29502481
- PMCID: PMC5843103
- DOI: 10.1177/0046958018759116
A Successful Pharmacist-Based Quality Initiative to Reduce Inappropriate Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis Use in an Academic Medical Intensive Care Unit
Abstract
Stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) is often inappropriately utilized, particularly in critically ill patients. The objective of this study is to find an effective way of reducing inappropriate SUP use in an academic medical intensive care unit (ICU). Medical ICU patients receiving SUP were identified over a 1-month period, and their charts were reviewed to determine whether American Society of Health-System Pharmacists guidelines were followed. Inappropriate usage was calculated as inappropriate patient-days and converted to incidence per 100 patient-days. Two interventions were implemented: (1) Pharmacists reviewed indications for SUP on each patient during daily team rounds and daily medication reconciliation and (2) residents rotating on ICU services were educated on a bimonthly basis. Postintervention data were obtained in a similar fashion. Prior to intervention, the incidence of inappropriate SUP usage was calculated to be 26.75 per 100 patient-days (n = 1099 total patient-days). Total cost attributable to the inappropriate use was $2433. Post intervention, we were able to decrease the inappropriate incidence of SUP usage to 7.14 per 100 patient-days (n = 1149 total patient-days). In addition, total cost of inappropriate use was reduced to $239.80. Our study highlights an effective multidisciplinary approach to reduce the inappropriate use of SUP in an academic medical ICU. We were able to reduce the incidence of inappropriate use of SUP by 73.31% ( P < .001). Furthermore, we were able to decrease the costs by approximately $2200/month.
Keywords: inappropriate; pharmacist; proton pump inhibitors; quality; stress ulcer prophylaxis.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
An interprofessional approach to reducing the overutilization of stress ulcer prophylaxis in adult medical and surgical intensive care units.Ann Pharmacother. 2014 Apr;48(4):462-9. doi: 10.1177/1060028013517088. Epub 2014 Jan 28. Ann Pharmacother. 2014. PMID: 24473490
-
Impact of a clinical pharmacist stress ulcer prophylaxis management program on inappropriate use in hospitalized patients.Am J Med. 2015 Aug;128(8):905-13. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.02.014. Epub 2015 Mar 27. Am J Med. 2015. PMID: 25820164
-
Benefit of an electronic medical record-based alarm in the optimization of stress ulcer prophylaxis.Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Aug-Sep;41(7):432-439. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2018.04.013. Epub 2018 Jun 9. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018. PMID: 29895412 English, Spanish.
-
Use of proton pump inhibitors for the provision of stress ulcer prophylaxis: clinical and economic consequences.Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Jan;32(1):5-13. doi: 10.1007/s40273-013-0119-5. Pharmacoeconomics. 2014. PMID: 24271943 Review.
-
Pharmacist-Led Intervention on the Inappropriate Use of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis Pharmacotherapy in Intensive Care Units: A Systematic review.Front Pharmacol. 2021 Oct 25;12:741724. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.741724. eCollection 2021. Front Pharmacol. 2021. PMID: 34759821 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Appropriateness and inappropriate medication predictors of stress ulcer prophylaxis in the intensive care unit.Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jan 7;15:1401335. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1401335. eCollection 2024. Front Pharmacol. 2025. PMID: 39840110 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative to reduce inappropriate usage of stress ulcer prophylaxis in hospitalized patients.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 May;86(5):903-912. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14197. Epub 2020 Jan 22. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020. PMID: 31840265 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis Discontinuation Guidance in Mechanically Ventilated, Critically Ill Patients: A Pre-Post Cohort Study.Hosp Pharm. 2022 Aug;57(4):510-517. doi: 10.1177/00185787211061371. Epub 2021 Dec 7. Hosp Pharm. 2022. PMID: 35898251 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of pharmacologic prophylaxis use against stress ulcer in the medical wards of University of Gondar Hospital.SAGE Open Med. 2019 Feb 2;7:2050312119827409. doi: 10.1177/2050312119827409. eCollection 2019. SAGE Open Med. 2019. PMID: 30746144 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of a Pharmacist-Led Intervention to Reduce Acid Suppression Therapy for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in ICUs in China: A Multicenter, Stepped-Wedge, Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.Crit Care Med. 2025 Apr 1;53(4):e805-e816. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006589. Epub 2025 Jan 30. Crit Care Med. 2025. PMID: 39887291 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Barletta JF, Bruno JJ, Buckley MS, Cook DJ. Stress ulcer prophylaxis. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(7):1395-1405. - PubMed
-
- Spirt MJ, Stanley S. Update on stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients. Crit Care Nurse. 2006;26(1):18-20, 22-28; quiz 29. - PubMed
-
- Barkun AN, Bardou M, Pham CQ, Martel M. Proton pump inhibitors vs. histamine 2 receptor antagonists for stress-related mucosal bleeding prophylaxis in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(4):507-520. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources