In-silico prediction of sweetness using structure-activity relationship models
- PMID: 29502811
- DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.01.111
In-silico prediction of sweetness using structure-activity relationship models
Abstract
Quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) models appear to be an ideal tool for quick screening of promising candidates from a vast library of molecules, which can then be further designed, synthesized and tested using a combination of rigorous first principle simulations, such as molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulation and experiments. In this study, QSAR models have been built with an extensive dataset of 487 compounds to predict the sweetness potency relative to sucrose (ranging 0.2-220,000). The whole dataset was randomly split into training and test sets in a 70:30 ratio. The models were developed using Genetic Function Approximation (Rtest2 = 0.832) and Artificial Neural Network (Rtest2 = 0.831). Our models thus offer a convenient route for fast screening of molecules prior to synthesis and testing. Additionally, this study can supplement a molecular modelling approach to improve binding of molecules with sweet taste receptors, leading to design of novel sweeteners.
Keywords: Artificial Neural Networks (ANN); Genetic Function Approximation (GFA); Quantitative structure activity relationships (QSAR); Relative sweetness (RS).
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Prediction of sweetness by multilinear regression analysis and support vector machine.J Food Sci. 2013 Sep;78(9):S1445-50. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.12199. Epub 2013 Aug 5. J Food Sci. 2013. PMID: 23915005
-
In-silico screening of database for finding potential sweet molecules: A combined data and structure based modeling approach.Food Chem. 2021 May 1;343:128538. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128538. Epub 2020 Nov 4. Food Chem. 2021. PMID: 33183872
-
Identifying the interactions between natural, non-caloric sweeteners and the human sweet receptor by molecular docking.Food Chem. 2018 Oct 30;264:164-171. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.04.113. Epub 2018 Apr 26. Food Chem. 2018. PMID: 29853362
-
Molecular mechanism of sweetness sensation.Physiol Behav. 2016 Oct 1;164(Pt B):453-463. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.03.015. Epub 2016 Mar 15. Physiol Behav. 2016. PMID: 26992959 Review.
-
Non-caloric sweeteners, sweetness modulators, and sweetener enhancers.Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. 2012;3:353-80. doi: 10.1146/annurev-food-022811-101236. Epub 2012 Jan 3. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. 2012. PMID: 22224551 Review.
Cited by
-
Data-Driven Elucidation of Flavor Chemistry.J Agric Food Chem. 2023 May 10;71(18):6789-6802. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c00909. Epub 2023 Apr 27. J Agric Food Chem. 2023. PMID: 37102791 Free PMC article. Review.
-
e-Sweet: A Machine-Learning Based Platform for the Prediction of Sweetener and Its Relative Sweetness.Front Chem. 2019 Jan 30;7:35. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2019.00035. eCollection 2019. Front Chem. 2019. PMID: 30761295 Free PMC article.
-
Intercorrelation Limits in Molecular Descriptor Preselection for QSAR/QSPR.Mol Inform. 2019 Aug;38(8-9):e1800154. doi: 10.1002/minf.201800154. Epub 2019 Apr 4. Mol Inform. 2019. PMID: 30945814 Free PMC article.
-
Structure-dependent effects of sweet and sweet taste affecting compounds on their sensorial properties.Food Chem X. 2020 Jul 8;7:100100. doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2020.100100. eCollection 2020 Sep 30. Food Chem X. 2020. PMID: 32904296 Free PMC article.
-
Toward a general and interpretable umami taste predictor using a multi-objective machine learning approach.Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 16;12(1):21735. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25935-3. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 36526644 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources