A study of factors influencing surgical cesarean delivery times in an academic tertiary center
- PMID: 29502992
- PMCID: PMC6277973
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.12.010
A study of factors influencing surgical cesarean delivery times in an academic tertiary center
Abstract
Background: Knowledge of hospital-specific average cesarean delivery operative times, and factors influencing length of surgery, can serve as a guide for anesthesiologists when choosing the optimal anesthetic technique. The aim of this study was to determine operative times and the factors influencing those times for cesarean delivery.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of all 1348 cesarean deliveries performed at an academic hospital in 2011. The primary outcome was mean operative time for first, second, third and fourth or more cesarean deliveries. The secondary goal was to identify factors influencing operative time. Variables included age, body mass index, previous surgery, gestational age, urgency of cesarean delivery, anesthesia type, surgeon's seniority, layers closed, and performance of tubal ligation.
Results: Mean (standard deviation) operative times for first (n=857), second (n=353), third (n=108) and fourth or more (n=30) cesarean deliveries were 56 (19), 60 (19), 69 (28) and 82 (31) minutes, respectively (P <0.0001, all groups different). Emergency status of the case and later gestational age were associated with shorter operative times. Higher body mass index, a less senior surgeon, the number of layers closed, and tubal ligation, increased operative times. These factors accounted for 18% of the variability.
Conclusions: Third and fourth cesarean delivery or the presence of other factors that could increase operative time may warrant catheter-based anesthetic techniques or the addition of adjunctive medications to prolong spinal anesthetic block. Institutional and individual surgeon factors may play an even more important role in determining surgical time.
Keywords: Cesarean delivery; Neuraxial anesthesia; Operative time.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest
None.
Figures


Comment in
-
Re: 'A study of factors influencing surgical cesarean delivery times in an academic tertiary center'.Int J Obstet Anesth. 2019 Nov;40:159. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.05.014. Epub 2019 Jun 1. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2019. PMID: 31235211 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Factors influencing cesarean delivery operative times: a prospective observational cohort study.Int J Obstet Anesth. 2010 Oct;19(4):417-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2010.06.009. Epub 2010 Sep 15. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2010. PMID: 20833027 Clinical Trial.
-
A retrospective analysis of factors associated with anesthetic case duration for cesarean deliveries.Int J Obstet Anesth. 2018 May;34:42-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2018.01.002. Epub 2018 Jan 13. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2018. PMID: 29496300
-
Anesthetic and obstetric outcomes in morbidly obese parturients: a 20-year follow-up retrospective cohort study.Int J Obstet Anesth. 2014 Nov;23(4):357-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2014.05.004. Epub 2014 Jun 4. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2014. PMID: 25201313
-
[Controversy on the method of sterilization during cesarean section: tubal ligation or hysterectomy? Review of the literature].Contracept Fertil Sex. 1994 Mar;22(3):167-72. Contracept Fertil Sex. 1994. PMID: 8019606 Review. French.
-
Overview of anesthetic considerations for Cesarean delivery.Br Med Bull. 2012;101:105-25. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldr050. Epub 2012 Jan 4. Br Med Bull. 2012. PMID: 22219238 Review.
Cited by
-
Prolonged operative time of cesarean is a risk marker for subsequent cesarean maternal complications.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Mar;307(3):739-746. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06575-4. Epub 2022 Apr 29. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023. PMID: 35488051
-
Maternal and neonatal characteristics, operative details and outcomes in COVID-19 positive parturients undergoing cesarean sections: A retrospective observational study.J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Jul;38(Suppl 1):S52-S57. doi: 10.4103/joacp.joacp_358_21. Epub 2022 Mar 28. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2022. PMID: 36060190 Free PMC article.
-
Pushing the Envelope in Obstetric Care: A Case Report of Cesarean Delivery in a Parturient with a BMI >100 kg m-2.Case Rep Anesthesiol. 2020 May 27;2020:5498584. doi: 10.1155/2020/5498584. eCollection 2020. Case Rep Anesthesiol. 2020. PMID: 32685215 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Blanchette H The rising cesarean delivery rate in America: what are the consequences? Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:687–90. - PubMed
-
- Husain T, Liu YM, Fernando R, et al. How UK obstetric anaesthetists assess neuraxial anaesthesia for caesarean delivery: national surveys of practice conducted in 2004 and 2010. Int J Obstet Anesth 2013;22:298–302. - PubMed
-
- Hawkins JL, Koonin LM, Palmer SK, Gibbs CP. Anesthesia-related deaths during obstetric delivery in the United States, 1979–1990. Anesthesiology 1997;86:277–84. - PubMed
-
- van Eijk RPA, van Veen-Berkx E, Kazemier G, Eijkemans MJC. Effect of individual surgeons and anesthesiologists on operating room time. Anesth Analg 2016;123:445–51. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical