Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018;62(4):1663-1681.
doi: 10.3233/JAD-170875.

Induction of Amyloid-β42 Production by Fipronil and Other Pyrazole Insecticides

Affiliations

Induction of Amyloid-β42 Production by Fipronil and Other Pyrazole Insecticides

Morgane Cam et al. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018.

Abstract

Generation of amyloid-β peptides (Aβs) by proteolytic cleavage of the amyloid-β protein precursor (AβPP), especially increased production of Aβ42/Aβ43 over Aβ40, and their aggregation as oligomers and plaques, represent a characteristic feature of Alzheimer's disease (AD). In familial AD (FAD), altered Aβ production originates from specific mutations of AβPP or presenilins 1/2 (PS1/PS2), the catalytic subunits of γ-secretase. In sporadic AD, the origin of altered production of Aβs remains unknown. We hypothesize that the 'human chemical exposome' contains products able to favor the production of Aβ42/Aβ43 over Aβ40 and shorter Aβs. To detect such products, we screened a library of 3500 + compounds in a cell-based assay for enhanced Aβ42/Aβ43 production. Nine pyrazole insecticides were found to induce a β- and γ-secretase-dependent, 3-10-fold increase in the production of extracellular Aβ42 in various cell lines and neurons differentiated from induced pluripotent stem cells derived from healthy and FAD patients. Immunoprecipitation/mass spectrometry analyses showed increased production of Aβs cleaved at positions 42/43, and reduced production of peptides cleaved at positions 38 and shorter. Strongly supporting a direct effect on γ-secretase activity, pyrazoles shifted the cleavage pattern of another γ-secretase substrate, alcadeinα, and shifted the cleavage of AβPP by highly purified γ-secretase toward Aβ42/Aβ43. Focusing on fipronil, we showed that some of its metabolites, in particular the persistent fipronil sulfone, also favor the production of Aβ42/Aβ43 in both cell-based and cell-free systems. Fipronil administered orally to mice and rats is known to be metabolized rapidly, mostly to fipronil sulfone, which stably accumulates in adipose tissue and brain. In conclusion, several widely used pyrazole insecticides enhance the production of toxic, aggregation prone Aβ42/Aβ43 peptides, suggesting the possible existence of environmental "Alzheimerogens" which may contribute to the initiation and propagation of the amyloidogenic process in sporadic AD.

Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; Aβ38; Aβ40; Aβ42; Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio; Aβ43; aftins; alzheimerogen; amyloid-β; amyloid-β protein precursor; fipronil; human chemical exposome; pesticides; phenylpyrazoles; prevention; pyrazoles; triazines; γ-secretase.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Some pyrazoles trigger the production of extracellular amyloid Aβ42. Effect of 18 pyrazoles on extracellular amyloid Aβ42 production by N2a-APP695 and CHO-7PA2-APPsw cells. Cells were treated with 100 μM of each compound for 18 h and cell supernatants were collected for extracellular Aβ42 levels measurement by an ELISA assay. Aftin-5 was used as a positive control and the corresponding volume of vehicle (DMSO) was used as a negative control. Levels are expressed as fold change, ± SE, of Aβ42 levels over the Aβ42 level of control, vehicle-treated cells. Average of five experiments performed in triplicate. Horizontal dotted lines indicate levels for 1- and 3- fold increases in Aβ42 concentration.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Molecular structure of the nine active pyrazoles.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Molecular structure of fipronil and some of its metabolites and derivatives.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Extracellular Aβ42 production induced by pyrazoles is inhibited by β-secretase inhibitor IV, γ-secretase inhibitors DAPT and BMS 299897, and γ-secretase modulator ‘Torrey Pines’. N2a-APP695 cells were exposed to 10 μM β-secretase inhibitor IV, 2 μM BMS 299897, 2 μM DAPT or 10 μM ‘Torrey Pines’ compound. 1.5 h later cells were exposed to 50 μM (2,5,8,14,16,18) or 25 μM (3, 4, 6) pyrazoles or 50 μM aftin-5. Extracellular Aβ42 levels were measured after 18 h and are expressed as fold change, ± SE, of Aβ42 level in pyrazole-treated cells over the Aβ42 level of control, vehicle-treated cells. Representative of two independent experiments performed in triplicates. Errors bars represent SE of all six values.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Absolute quantification of Aβ38, Aβ40, and Aβ42 using LC-MS/MS. Levels of the three Aβs were determined by mass spectrometry in supernatants of N2a-APP695 cells following 18 h treatment with DMSO, 100 μM of pyrazoles 18,20, or 21. Amyloid levels are expressed as percentage of levels in vehicle-treated cells (average ± SE of quadriplicate values; absolute values in control cell supernatants are indicated) and Aβ42/Aβ40 ratios are indicated in parentheses. Horizontal dotted line indicates basal Aβ levels versus the values in DMSO-treated cells.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Pattern of Aβs produced by N2a-APP695 cells exposed to pyrazoles 18, 20, or 21. Cells were treated for 18 h with DMSO or 20 μM of each pyrazole. Cell supernatants were collected and analyzed as described. Quantification of all Aβs in N2a-APP695 cells supernatants are presented as percentage of total amyloids. Note the decrease in peptides Aβ1–19, Aβ1–37, Aβ1–38, the increase in Aβ1–40 and the appearance of Aβ1–42 and Aβ1–43 in the supernatants of pyrazole-treated cells (these two peptides are undetectable in the supernatant of DMSO-treated cells).
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.
Pyrazoles trigger enhanced production of Aβ42 versus Aβ40 in neurons differentiated from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Neurons were derived from iPSCs obtained from healthy donor (APP WT, white bars) or from an AD patient with APP K724N mutation (grey bars). They were exposed for 24 h to DMSO (control), 100 μM aftin-5 or the nine pyrazoles. Cell supernatants were collected for extracellular Aβ40 and Aβ42 levels measurement by an ELISA assay. Levels are expressed as Aβ42/Aβ40 ratios ± SE of triplicate values. Horizontal dotted line indicates level for basal Aβ42/Aβ40 ratios.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 8.
Mass spectrometric analysis of the Aβs generated in cell-free γ-secretase assays, in the presence of DMSO or fipronils 18, 20, or 21. A) The Aβs generated by highly purified γ-secretase in the presence of 100 μM of fipronil (18), fipronil sulfone (20) or fipronil desulfinyl (21) or DMSO (vehicle) were pooled from triplicates of the activity assays, immunoprecipitated overnight with the anti-Aβ antibody 4G8 and protein G and analyzed by MALDI-TOF in a reflectron mode. The Aβs generated from the recombinant APP-C99 contain an N-terminal methionine, which results in a mass shift of +149m/z when compared to endogenous Aβ peptides. B) Note the increased Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio for fipronils 18, 20, and 21, and the increased Aβ43/Aβ40 ratio for fipronil sulfone (20).
Fig. 9.
Fig. 9.
Pyrazoles alter the cleavage pattern of Alcadeinα, leading to increased p3-Alcα38 production. A) Immunoprecipitation/mass spectrometry spectra of p3-Alcα peptides produced by HEK cells expressing full length Alcadeinα exposed to various pyrazoles or DMSO (control). Cells were treated for 48 h with 100 μM of each reagent and p3-Alc peptides were analyzed by MALDI-TOF/MS. A) Representative profile for each product showing the the p3-Alcα2N+34, p3-Alcα2N+35, p3-Alcα2N+36, p3-Alcα2N+37 and p3-Alcα2N+38 peaks. B) Relative quantification of p3-Alcα peptides produced by cells exposed to DMSO (control), fipronil (18), fipronil sulfone (20) or fipronil desulfinyl (21). Levels of each peptide are presented as ratios of p3-Alcα2N+38 versus p3-Alcα2N+35 (average ± SE of triplicate values).
Fig. 10.
Fig. 10.
Proteomics and phosphoproteomics analysis of N2a-APP695 cells exposed to fipronil sulfone (20) and dipropetryn. A) N2a-APP695 cells were exposed for 18 h to 20 μM fipronil sulfone (20), 100 μM dipropetryn or DMSO. This led to increased extracellular Aβ42 expression (3.58 ± 0.05 and 7.87 ± 0.81 fold change for fipronil sulfone (20) and dipropetryn, respectively, compared to DMSO-treated cells). Up/downregulated proteins in fipronil sulfone- (1634) and dipropetryn- (1638) treated cells versus DMSO-treated cells were identified and compared. Among the 261 common proteins, 178 proteins (listed in Supplementary Table 1) were either upregulated by both treatments or downregulated by both treatments. B) DAVID analysis of the 178 proteins common to fipronil sulfone (20) and dipropetryn treatments. Data are selected with p-value < 0.01 and FDR < 0.05. FDR, False Discovery Rate.
Fig. 11.
Fig. 11.
Short-term (72 hrs) time-course of fipronil (18) and fipronil sulfone (20) bioaccumulation in brain (A) and epididymal adipose tissue (B) following a single oral administration of fipronil (18) to mice. Fipronil (18) (10 mg/kg) was administrated by oral gavage at time 0. Animals were sacrificed at various times and plasma, epididymal adipose tissue and brain were collected. Fipronil (18) and fipronil sulfone (20) levels were quantified by LC-MS/MS. Concentrations are expressed as μg/brain or (μg/epididymal adipose tissue.
Fig. 12.
Fig. 12.
Long-term (56 days) time-course of fipronil sulfone (20) production and accumulation following single (A) or repeated (B) oral administrations of fipronil (18) to mice. A) Fipronil (18) (10 mg/kg) was administrated by oral gavage on day 0. Animals were sacrificed at various times and plasma, epididymal adipose tissue and brain were collected. Fipronil sulfone (20) levels were quantified by LC-MS/MS. B) Fipronil (18) (10 mg/kg) was administrated by oral gavage 5 days/week for 3 weeks (times of administration are indicated by black dots). Animals were sacrificed at various times and plasma, epididymal adipose tissue and brain were collected. Fipronil sulfone (20) levels were quantified by LC-MS/MS. Concentrations are expressed as μg/brain, μg/epididymal adipose tissue or μg/mL plasma.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alzheimer’s Association (2017) 2017 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement 13, 325–373.
    1. Huang Y, Mucke L (2012) Alzheimer mechanisms and therapeutic strategies. Cell 148,1204–1222. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vinters HV (2015) Emerging concepts in Alzheimer’s disease. Annu Rev Pathol 10, 291–319. - PubMed
    1. Canter RG, Penney J, Tsai LH (2016) The road to restoring neural circuits for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 539,187–196. - PubMed
    1. Kuperstein I, Broersen K, Benilova I, Rozenski J, Jonckheere W, Debulpaep M, Vandersteen A, Segers-Nolten I, Van Der Werf K, Subramaniam V, Braeken D, Callewaert G, Bartic C, D’Hooge R, Martins IC, Rousseau F, Schymkowitz J, De Strooper B (2010) Neurotoxicity of Alzheimer’s disease Aβ peptides is induced by small changes in the Aβ42 to Aβ40 ratio. EMBO J 29, 3408–3420. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms