Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis in Patients With Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists Joint Review
- PMID: 29504847
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.8671
Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis in Patients With Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists Joint Review
Abstract
Purpose Clinical use of analytical tests to assess genomic variants in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is increasing. This joint review from ASCO and the College of American Pathologists summarizes current information about clinical ctDNA assays and provides a framework for future research. Methods An Expert Panel conducted a literature review on the use of ctDNA assays for solid tumors, including pre-analytical variables, analytical validity, interpretation and reporting, and clinical validity and utility. Results The literature search identified 1,338 references. Of those, 390, plus 31 references supplied by the Expert Panel, were selected for full-text review. There were 77 articles selected for inclusion. Conclusion The evidence indicates that testing for ctDNA is optimally performed on plasma collected in cell stabilization or EDTA tubes, with EDTA tubes processed within 6 hours of collection. Some ctDNA assays have demonstrated clinical validity and utility with certain types of advanced cancer; however, there is insufficient evidence of clinical validity and utility for the majority of ctDNA assays in advanced cancer. Evidence shows discordance between the results of ctDNA assays and genotyping tumor specimens and supports tumor tissue genotyping to confirm undetected results from ctDNA tests. There is no evidence of clinical utility and little evidence of clinical validity of ctDNA assays in early-stage cancer, treatment monitoring, or residual disease detection. There is no evidence of clinical validity and clinical utility to suggest that ctDNA assays are useful for cancer screening, outside of a clinical trial. Given the rapid pace of research, re-evaluation of the literature will shortly be required, along with the development of tools and guidance for clinical practice.
Comment in
-
ctDNA Analysis for Cancer? Not So Fast.Cancer Discov. 2018 May;8(5):526. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-NB2018-033. Epub 2018 Mar 23. Cancer Discov. 2018. PMID: 29572234
Similar articles
-
Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis in Patients With Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists Joint Review.Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018 Oct;142(10):1242-1253. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0901-SA. Epub 2018 Mar 5. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018. PMID: 29504834 Review.
-
Application of circulating tumor DNA in prospective clinical oncology trials - standardization of preanalytical conditions.Mol Oncol. 2017 Mar;11(3):295-304. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12037. Epub 2017 Feb 22. Mol Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28164427 Free PMC article.
-
The cornerstone of integrating circulating tumor DNA into cancer management.Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2019 Jan;1871(1):1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 9. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2019. PMID: 30419316 Review.
-
A Study of Pre-Analytical Variables and Optimization of Extraction Method for Circulating Tumor DNA Measurements by Digital Droplet PCR.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 May;28(5):909-916. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0586. Epub 2019 Mar 1. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019. PMID: 30824523
-
Nanotechnology Strategies for the Analysis of Circulating Tumor DNA: A Review.Med Sci Monit. 2020 Mar 22;26:e921040. doi: 10.12659/MSM.921040. Med Sci Monit. 2020. PMID: 32200389 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Patient-centric thresholding of Cobas® EGFR mutation Test v2 for surveillance of EGFR-mutated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 6;14(1):18191. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68350-6. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39107402 Free PMC article.
-
Biopsy of distant metastasis is not a significant prognostic factor for synchronous metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End-Results Registry.J Cancer. 2021 May 27;12(14):4424-4432. doi: 10.7150/jca.54686. eCollection 2021. J Cancer. 2021. PMID: 34093843 Free PMC article.
-
Strategies for the successful implementation of plasma-based NSCLC genotyping in clinical practice.Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2021 Jan;18(1):56-62. doi: 10.1038/s41571-020-0423-x. Epub 2020 Sep 11. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2021. PMID: 32918064 Review.
-
Cervical Cancer Genetic Profile through Circulating Tumor DNA: What Can We Learn from Blood?Biomolecules. 2024 Jul 10;14(7):825. doi: 10.3390/biom14070825. Biomolecules. 2024. PMID: 39062539 Free PMC article. Review.
-
RELAY phase 3 randomized study: a step closer to the clinic for ctDNA in non-small cell lung cancer treatment monitoring?Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2023 Nov 30;12(11):2151-2156. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-23-684. Epub 2023 Nov 24. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2023. PMID: 38090513 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical