Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr 1;33(2):175-185.
doi: 10.1093/her/cyy007.

Training reproductive health providers to talk about intimate partner violence and reproductive coercion: an exploratory study

Affiliations

Training reproductive health providers to talk about intimate partner violence and reproductive coercion: an exploratory study

H Zachor et al. Health Educ Res. .

Abstract

To explore the effect of provider communication-skills training on frequency of intimate partner violence (IPV) and reproductive coercion (RC) assessment, four family planning clinics were randomized to IPV/RC communication-skills building workshop or standard knowledge-based IPV/RC training and compared to historical controls from the same clinics (before any training). Female patients aged 16-29 completed after-visit surveys. Primary outcomes included provider discussion about IPV/RC, receipt of safety card with IPV/RC resources and patient disclosure of IPV/RC. Chi-square tests were used to compare groups that received training and historical controls. Participants (training: n = 103; historical control: n = 576) were predominantly white with mean age of 22. More patients reported discussion about healthy relationships in both training groups (78-90%) compared to historical controls (49-52%, P < 0.001 for both). Discussion on birth control sabotage and pregnancy coercion was infrequent with patient-participants in both groups (6-17 and 4-13%, respectively). More patients in the clinics that received training reported receiving a safety card (72-84%) as compared to historical controls (9%, P < 0.001 for both). Overall, in this exploratory study, both communication-skills and standard training improved frequency of IPV communication when compared to historical controls but with few differences when compared to each other.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Chamberlain L, Levenson R. Addressing Intimate Partner Violence, Reproductive and Sexual Coercion: A Guide for Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Reproductive Health Care Settings: Futures Without Violence, 2012.
    1. Committee Opinion No. 518: Intimate Partner Violence: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2012.
    1. O’Doherty L, Hegarty K, Ramsay J. et al. Screening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings. Cochr Database Syst Rev 2015; 7: CD007007. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miller E, Decker MR, Raj A. et al. Intimate partner violence and health care-seeking patterns among female users of urban adolescent clinics. Matern Child Health J 2010; 14: 910–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Keeling J, Birch L.. The prevalence rates of domestic abuse in women attending a family planning clinic. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2004; 30: 113–4. - PubMed

Publication types