Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 5;15(1):14.
doi: 10.1186/s12984-018-0355-1.

The effects of gait training using powered lower limb exoskeleton robot on individuals with complete spinal cord injury

Affiliations

The effects of gait training using powered lower limb exoskeleton robot on individuals with complete spinal cord injury

Cheng-Hua Wu et al. J Neuroeng Rehabil. .

Abstract

Background: Powered exoskeleton can improve the mobility for people with movement deficits by providing mechanical support and facilitate the gait training. This pilot study evaluated the effect of gait training using a newly developed powered lower limb exoskeleton robot for individuals with complete spinal cord injury (SCI).

Methods: Two participants with a complete SCI were recruited for this clinical study. The powered exoskeleton gait training was 8 weeks, 1 h per session, and 2 sessions per week. The evaluation was performed before and after the training for (1) the time taken by the user to don and doff the powered exoskeleton independently, (2) the level of exertion perceived by participants while using the powered exoskeleton, and (3) the mobility performance included the timed up-and-go test, 10-m walk test, and 6-min walk test with the powered exoskeleton. The safety of the powered exoskeleton was evaluated on the basis of injury reports and the incidence of falls or imbalance while using the device.

Results: The results indicated that the participants were donning and doffing the powered lower limb exoskeleton robot independently with a lower level of exertion and walked faster and farther without any injury or fall incidence when using the powered exoskeleton than when using a knee-ankle-foot orthosis. Bone mineral densities was also increased after the gait training. No adverse effects, such as skin abrasions, or discomfort were reported while using the powered exoskeleton.

Conclusions: The findings demonstrated that individuals with complete SCI used the powered lower limb exoskeleton robot independently without any assistance after 8 weeks of powered exoskeleton gait training.

Trial registration: Trial registration: National Taiwan University Hospital.

Trial registration number: 201210051RIB . Name of registry: Hui-Fen Mao. URL of registry: Not available. Date of registration: December 12th, 2012. Date of enrolment of the first participant to the trial: January 3rd, 2013.

Keywords: Assistive device; Complete spinal injury; Exoskeleton robot; Gait; Training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the institutional review board by the National Taiwan University Hospital Institutional Review Board, and the participants were provided informed consent after a full explanation of the purpose and protocol of this study. All coauthors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The powered exoskeleton robot (a), the forearm crutches (b), the right controller (c), and the left controller (d) that were used in the study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Waist open/close design of the powered exoskeleton
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Flow chart of the powered exoskeleton control algorism
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Aadjustable dimensions of the powered exoskeleton

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Waters RL, Lunsford BR. Energy cost of paraplegic locomotion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67:1245–1250. doi: 10.2106/00004623-198567080-00016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fatone S. A review of the literature pertaining to KAFOs and HKAFOs for ambulation. J Prosthet Orthot. 2006;18:137–168. doi: 10.1097/00008526-200606001-00003. - DOI
    1. Mooney LM, Herr HM. Biomechanical walking mechanisms underlying the metabolic reduction caused by an autonomous exoskeleton. J NeuroEng Rehabil. 2016;13:4. doi: 10.1186/s12984-016-0111-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Young A, Foss J, Gannon H, Ferris DP. Influence of power delivery timing on the energetics and biomechanics of humans wearing a hip exoskeleton. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2017;5. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5340778/. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Requejo PS, Wahl DP, Bontrager EL, Newsam CJ, Gronley JK, Mulroy SJ, Perry J. Upper extremity kinetics during Lofstrand crutch-assisted gait. Med Eng Phys. 2005;27:19–29. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.08.008. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types