Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 5;8(1):4017.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22389-4.

Effect of long-term fertilisation on the weed community of a winter wheat field

Affiliations

Effect of long-term fertilisation on the weed community of a winter wheat field

Min Jiang et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Effects of fertilisation and other management techniques on a weed community were evaluated during wheat growth in a rice-wheat cropping system. Fertiliser treatments were C0 (C means chemical, C0 means zero chemical fertiliser.), CN (N fertiliser), CNK (N plus K fertiliser), CNPK (N plus P and K fertiliser), CNP (N plus P fertiliser), and CPK (P plus K fertiliser). Weed density, biomass, and bio-diversity were determined. Redundancy analysis (RDA) was used to investigate the relationship between fertiliser management, weed species, and weed density. The overall weed densities in the C0 and CPK treatments were the greatest during wheat seeding and ripening periods and were significantly greater than densities in the other treatments. N, P and organic matter in soil were highly correlated with weed species and density, whereas K in soil was not significantly correlated with weed species and weed density. N fertiliser significantly reduced weed density. Balanced fertilisation maintained weed species richness and resulting in a high yield of wheat. CNPK application reduced weed damage and improved the productivity and stability of the farmland ecosystem.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The community structure features under different long-term fertilisation treatments. Different lowercase letters represent significant differences at the 0.05 level. (C0 = no fertiliser application; CN = nitrogen fertiliser only; CNP = nitrogen plus phosphorus fertiliser; CNK = nitrogen plus potassium fertiliser; CPK = phosphorus and potassium fertiliser; CNPK = combined fertiliser with nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium).
Figure 2
Figure 2
RDA analysis of effects of different fertilisation treatments on weed species and density growth in wheat field. (C0 = no fertiliser application; CN = nitrogen fertiliser only; CNP = nitrogen plus phosphorus fertiliser; CNK = nitrogen plus potassium fertiliser; CPK = phosphorus and potassium fertiliser; CNPK = combined fertiliser with nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium). Redundancy analysis (RDA), also called reduced-rank regression, the canonical form of PCA. Special cases are simple and multiple regression, analysis of variance and the log-ratio form of reduced-rank regression principal components analysis (PCA). The arrow represents the environmental factor, the quadrant where the arrow is located represents the positive and negative correlation between the environmental factor and the ordination axis, and the length of the arrow connection represents the degree of correlation between an environmental factor and the distribution of the research objects. The longer the connection, the impact of this environmental factor on the distribution of objects is greater. The angle between the arrow connection and the ordination axis represents the correlation between the certain environmental factor and the ordination axis. The smaller the angle is, the higher the correlation is.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anderson RL, Tanaka DL, Black AL, Schweizer EE. Weed Community and Species Response to Crop Rotation, Tillage and Nitrogen Fertility. Weed Technol. 1998;12:531–536.
    1. Welch RY, Behnke GD, Davis AS, Masiunas J, Villamil MB. Using Cover Crops in Headlands of Organic Grain Farms: Effects On Soil Properties, Weeds and Crop Yields. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environmen. 2016;216:322–332. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2015.10.014. - DOI
    1. Tarek AE. Chemical Fertiliser Could Offer a Real Solution for Minimizing Over Consumption of Herbicides for Controlling Weeds in Faba Bean. Trends in Applied Sciences Research. 2008;3:142–153. doi: 10.3923/tasr.2008.142.153. - DOI
    1. Grant CA, Derksen DA, Blackshaw RE, T E, Janzen HH. Differential Response of Weed and Crop Species to Potassium and Sulphur Fertilisers. Can J Plant Sci. 2007;87:293–296. doi: 10.4141/P06-138. - DOI
    1. Nichols V, Verhulst N, Cox R, Govaerts B. Weed Dynamics and Conservation Agriculture Principles: A Review. Field Crop Res. 2015;183:56–68. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.07.012. - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources