Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun;27(6):1599-1611.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1820-9. Epub 2018 Mar 5.

Short form development for oral health patient-reported outcome evaluation in children and adolescents

Affiliations

Short form development for oral health patient-reported outcome evaluation in children and adolescents

Honghu Liu et al. Qual Life Res. 2018 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: Children and adolescents are vulnerable to dental problems and oral diseases. This paper presents the development of two multi-item self-report scales for use in assessing oral health status of children and adolescents.

Methods: Following the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System framework, survey questions were designed using a newly developed conceptual model. These items were administered to 334 children and adolescents (8-17 years) along with concurrent dental exams. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted and the item response theory graded response model was used to estimate item parameters and oral health status scores and to identify short-form items. The items were selected by high level of information and wide coverage of different domains to assess Child Oral Health Status Index (COHSI) and treatment referral recommendations (RR).

Results: The long form consists of 28 items. The short-form includes 12 items (8 for COHSI and 7 for RR with 3 common items).The intra-class correlations between long form and short-form were 0.90 for COHSI and 0.87 for RR.

Conclusion: The short-forms provide a possible solution for the longstanding challenge of oral health evaluation for large populations of children and adolescents. The calibrated long form provides the foundation for computer adaptive test administration. These oral health assessment toolkits can be used for oral health screening, surveillance program, policy planning, and research.

Keywords: Children; Oral health; Patient-reported outcomes; Short-forms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The domain structure of child oral health conceptual model based on PROMIS framework
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Information curve for both COHSI and referral (long form vs. short-form). Conversion of raw scores to t scores are given in Table 5 (COHSI) and Table 6 (RR)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS), Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (2000). Healthy People 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
    1. Munoz KA, Krebs-Smith SM, Ballard-Barbash R, & Cleve-land LE (1997). Food intakes of US children and adolescents compared with recommendations. Pediatrics, 100(3), 323–329. - PubMed
    1. Frary CD, Johnson RK, & Wang MQ (2004). Children and adolescents’ choices of foods and beverages high in added sugars are associated with intakes of key nutrients and food groups. Journal of Adolescent Health, 34(1), 56–63. - PubMed
    1. Petersen PE, Bourgeois D, Ogawa H, Estupinan-Day S, & Ndiaye C (2005). The global burden of oral diseases and risks to oral health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 83(9), 661–669. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kalsbeek H, & Verrips G (1994). Consumption of sweet snacks and caries experience of primary school children. Caries- Research, 28(6), 477–483. - PubMed