Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun;33(6):948-954.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4356-3. Epub 2018 Mar 5.

Valued Components of a Consultant Letter from Referring Physicians' Perspective: a Systematic Literature Synthesis

Affiliations

Valued Components of a Consultant Letter from Referring Physicians' Perspective: a Systematic Literature Synthesis

Arjun H Rash et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Effective communication between the consultants and physicians form an integral foundation of effective and expert patient care. A broad review of the literature has not been undertaken to determine the components of a consultant's letter of most value to the referring physician. We aimed to identify the components of a consultant's letter preferred by referring physicians.

Methods: We searched Embase and MEDLINE (OVID) Medicine (EBM) Reviews and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for English articles with no restriction on initial date to January 6, 2017. Articles containing letters from specialists to referring physicians regarding outpatient assessments with either an observational or experimental design were included. Studies were excluded if they pertained to communications from referring physicians to consultant specialists, or pertained to allied health professionals, inpatient documents, or opinion articles. We enumerated the frequencies with which three common themes were addressed, and the positive or negative nature of the comments. The three themes were the structure of consultant letters, their contents, and whether referring physicians and consultants shared a common opinion about the items.

Results: Eighteen articles were included in our synthesis. In 11 reports, 91% of respondents preferred structured formats. Other preferred structural features were problem lists and brevity (four reports each). The most preferred contents were oriented to insight: diagnosis, prognosis, and management plan (16/21 mentions in the top tertile). Data items such as history, physical examination, and medication lists were less important (1/23 mentions in the top tertile). Reports varied as to whether referring physicians and consultants shared common opinions about letter features.

Conclusions: Referring physicians prefer brief, structured letters from consultants that feature diagnostic and prognostic opinions and management plans over unstructured letters that emphasize data elements such as detailed histories and medication lists. Whether these features improve outcomes is unknown.

Keywords: consultant’s letters; letter format; physician communication; structured letters.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram.

References

    1. Berta W, Barnsley J, Bloom J, et al. Enhancing continuity of information: essential components of consultation reports. Can Fam Phys. 2009;55:624–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Melville C, Hands S, Jones P. Randomised trial of the effects of structuring clinic correspondence. Arch Dis Child. 2002;86:374–375. doi: 10.1136/adc.86.5.374. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. François J. Tool to assess the quality of consultation and referral request letters in family medicine. Can Fam Physician. 2011;57:574–575. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lingard L, Hodges B, MacRae H, Freeman R. Expert and trainee determinations of rhetorical relevance in referral and consultation letters. Med Educ. 2004;38:168–176. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2004.01745.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goldman L, Lee T, Rudd P. Ten commandments for effective consultations. Arch Intern Med. 1983;143:1753–1755. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1983.00350090131022. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources