Working plan for the use of patient-reported outcome measures in adults with brain tumours: a Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) initiative
- PMID: 29508764
- DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30004-4
Working plan for the use of patient-reported outcome measures in adults with brain tumours: a Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) initiative
Abstract
The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology-Patient-Reported Outcome (RANO-PRO) working group is an international multidisciplinary collaboration that provides guidance on the use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in clinical trials and practice for adult patients with brain tumours. Findings from both PROs and traditional outcome measures, such as survival, and clinical or radiological response, are essential to inform the research community, policy makers, physicians, and patients in the treatment decision-making process. Previous initiatives in oncology have focused on guidelines concerning the collection, analysis, interpretation, and reporting of PRO data. However, we recommend the application of appropriate PRO instruments, with respect to its content and measurement properties (ie, research question, content validity, and other measurement properties), in brain tumour research. PROs should be well defined and reliable to generate high-quality evidence, and our recommendations on the use of specific PRO measures could help to improve the quality of PRO evidence derived from neuro-oncological studies, and might add a new dimension in how the value of therapeutics is assessed in patients with brain tumours. In this Policy Review, we present the RANO-PRO working plan for the use of PROs in adults with brain tumours.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Automated quantitative tumour response assessment of MRI in neuro-oncology with artificial neural networks: a multicentre, retrospective study.Lancet Oncol. 2019 May;20(5):728-740. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30098-1. Epub 2019 Apr 2. Lancet Oncol. 2019. PMID: 30952559
-
Systematic review on the use of patient-reported outcome measures in brain tumor studies: part of the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Patient-Reported Outcome (RANO-PRO) initiative.Neurooncol Pract. 2021 Feb 13;8(4):417-425. doi: 10.1093/nop/npab013. eCollection 2021 Aug. Neurooncol Pract. 2021. PMID: 34277020 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The position of the neurologist in neuro-oncology.Eur J Neurol. 2002 May;9(3):201-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-1331.2002.00411.x. Eur J Neurol. 2002. PMID: 11985627 Review.
-
Application of novel response/progression measures for surgically delivered therapies for gliomas: Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Working Group.Neurosurgery. 2012 Jan;70(1):234-43; discussion 243-4. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318223f5a7. Neurosurgery. 2012. PMID: 21593697 Review.
-
Evolution of RANO in Assessing Brain Tumour Outcomes.J Pak Med Assoc. 2024 Mar;74(3):595-596. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.24-19. J Pak Med Assoc. 2024. PMID: 38591309
Cited by
-
Fluorescence Guidance in Glioma Surgery: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence and the Drive Towards Objective Margin Differentiation.Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 17;17(12):2019. doi: 10.3390/cancers17122019. Cancers (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40563668 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Importance of Shared Decision-Making for Patients with Glioblastoma.Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Sep 10;15:2009-2016. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S314792. eCollection 2021. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021. PMID: 34531651 Free PMC article.
-
Health-Related Quality of Life in Intracranial Meningioma: Current Evidence and Future Directions.Adv Exp Med Biol. 2023;1416:235-252. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-29750-2_18. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2023. PMID: 37432632
-
Quality of life outcomes in incidental and operated meningiomas (QUALMS): a cross-sectional cohort study.J Neurooncol. 2023 Jan;161(2):317-327. doi: 10.1007/s11060-022-04198-y. Epub 2022 Dec 16. J Neurooncol. 2023. PMID: 36525165 Free PMC article.
-
A Position Statement on the Utility of Interval Imaging in Standard of Care Brain Tumour Management: Defining the Evidence Gap and Opportunities for Future Research.Front Oncol. 2021 Feb 9;11:620070. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.620070. eCollection 2021. Front Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33634034 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous