Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 6;23(3):583.
doi: 10.3390/molecules23030583.

Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Lupinalbin A Isolated from Apios americana on Lipopolysaccharide-Treated RAW264.7 Cells

Affiliations

Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Lupinalbin A Isolated from Apios americana on Lipopolysaccharide-Treated RAW264.7 Cells

Hyo-Young Kim et al. Molecules. .

Abstract

Apios americana, a leguminous plant, is used as food in some countries. Although the biological activities of Apios extract have been reported, there have been no reports about the anti-inflammatory mechanism of lupinalbin A on the RAW264.7 cells. In this study, we investigated the anti-inflammatory effect of A. americana lupinalbin A on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-treated RAW264.7 cells. Lupinalbin A significantly inhibited nitric oxide production and inducible nitric oxide synthase expression in LPS-treated RAW264.7 cells. The expression of cytokines, including interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, and chemokine of monocyte chemoattractant protein, was reduced under lupinalbin A exposure in LPS-treated RAW264.7 cells. In addition, lupinalbin A significantly decreased LPS-induced interferon (IFN)-β production and STAT1 protein levels in RAW264.7 cells. Taken together, these results suggest that A. americana lupinalbin A exerts anti-inflammatory effects via the inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokines and blocking of IFN-β/STAT1 pathway activation.

Keywords: Apios americana; anti-inflammatory effects; lipopolysaccharide; lupinalbin A.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Chemical structure of lupinalbin A and effect of lupinalbin A on cell viability in RAW264.7 cells. (A) The chemical structure of lupinalbin A; (B) Cell viability was measured by EZ-Cytox cell viability assay. Cells were treated with various concentrations of lupinalbin A (5–200 µM) for 24 h. The data are presented as mean ± SDs (n = 6).
Figure 1
Figure 1
Chemical structure of lupinalbin A and effect of lupinalbin A on cell viability in RAW264.7 cells. (A) The chemical structure of lupinalbin A; (B) Cell viability was measured by EZ-Cytox cell viability assay. Cells were treated with various concentrations of lupinalbin A (5–200 µM) for 24 h. The data are presented as mean ± SDs (n = 6).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of lupinalbin A on NO production and iNOS protein and iNOS mRNA expression in LPS-treated RAW264.7 cells. (A) Cells were treated with various concentrations of lupinalbin A (5–100 µM) for 2 h and then incubated with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 18 h. The data are presented as mean ± SDs (n = 6). # p < 0.05 vs. control group, * p < 0.05 vs. LPS-treated group; (B) iNOS protein levels were measured by western blot; (C) Cells were treated with various concentrations of lupinalbin A (5–100 µM) for 2 h and then stimulated with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 18 h. iNOS mRNA expression levels were measured by qRT-PCR. The data are presented as mean ± SDs (n = 3). # p < 0.05 vs. control group, * p < 0.05 vs. LPS-treated group.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of lupinalbin A on NO production and iNOS protein and iNOS mRNA expression in LPS-treated RAW264.7 cells. (A) Cells were treated with various concentrations of lupinalbin A (5–100 µM) for 2 h and then incubated with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 18 h. The data are presented as mean ± SDs (n = 6). # p < 0.05 vs. control group, * p < 0.05 vs. LPS-treated group; (B) iNOS protein levels were measured by western blot; (C) Cells were treated with various concentrations of lupinalbin A (5–100 µM) for 2 h and then stimulated with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 18 h. iNOS mRNA expression levels were measured by qRT-PCR. The data are presented as mean ± SDs (n = 3). # p < 0.05 vs. control group, * p < 0.05 vs. LPS-treated group.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effect of lupinalbin A on (A) IL-6; (B) TNF-α; and (C) MCP-1 production in LPS-treated RAW264.7 cells. The cells were treated with various concentrations of lupinalbin A (5–100 µM) for 2 h and then stimulated with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 18 h. IL-6, TNF-α, and MCP-1 production was determined by ELISA. The data are presented as mean ± SDs (n = 3). # p < 0.05 vs. control group, * p < 0.05 vs. LPS-treated group.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effect of lupinalbin A on (A) IL-6; (B) TNF-α; and (C) MCP-1 production in LPS-treated RAW264.7 cells. The cells were treated with various concentrations of lupinalbin A (5–100 µM) for 2 h and then stimulated with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 18 h. IL-6, TNF-α, and MCP-1 production was determined by ELISA. The data are presented as mean ± SDs (n = 3). # p < 0.05 vs. control group, * p < 0.05 vs. LPS-treated group.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effect of lupinalbin A on (A) IL-6; (B) TNF-α; and (C) MCP-1 mRNA expression in LPS-treated RAW264.7 cells. Cells were treated with various concentrations of lupinalbin A (5–100 µM) for 2 h and then stimulated with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 18 h. IL-6, TNF-α, and MCP-1 mRNA expression levels were determined by qRT-PCR. The data are presented as mean ± SDs (n = 3). # p < 0.05 vs. control group, * p < 0.05 vs. LPS-treated group.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Effect of lupinalbin A on IFN-β production and STAT1 protein in LPS-treated RAW264.7 cells. (A) Cells were treated with various concentrations of lupinalbin A (5–100 µM) for 2 h and then stimulated with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 18 h. IFN-β production was determined by ELISA. The data are presented as mean ± SDs (n = 3). # p < 0.05 vs. control group, * p < 0.05 vs. LPS-treated group; (B) STAT1 protein levels were measured by western blot analysis.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Medzhitov R. Origin and physiological roles of inflammation. Nature. 2008;454:428–435. doi: 10.1038/nature07201. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Libby P., Ridker P.M., Maseri A. Inflammation and atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2002;105:1135–1143. doi: 10.1161/hc0902.104353. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Manzi S., Wasko M.C. Inflammation-mediated rheumatic diseases and atherosclerosis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2000;59:321–325. doi: 10.1136/ard.59.5.321. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tak P.P., Firestein G.S. NF-κB: A key role in inflammatory diseases. J. Clin. Investig. 2001;107:7–11. doi: 10.1172/JCI11830. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marletta M.A. Nitric oxide synthase structure and mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 1993;268:12231–12234. - PubMed

MeSH terms