Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr 1;59(suppl_2):ii54-ii64.
doi: 10.1093/jrr/rry004.

Medical management of acute radiation syndrome and associated infections in a high-casualty incident

Affiliations

Medical management of acute radiation syndrome and associated infections in a high-casualty incident

Nicholas Dainiak. J Radiat Res. .

Abstract

A high-casualty incident may result in a significant human toll due to the inability of a community to meet the health care demands of the population. A successful medical response requires health care facilities to not only communicate and integrate medical services, meet surge capacity, protect health care workers and implement triage and treatment protocols, but also to provide the venue for clinical management of acute radiation injuries and their associated infections. Today, clinical management is primarily guided by the recommendations of a Consultancy that were made at the World Health Organization (WHO). This international consensus was reached on evidence-based, clinical management of each of the four sub-syndromes that compose acute radiation syndrome (ARS), including the hematopoietic subsyndrome (HS), gastrointestinal subsyndrome (GIS), neurovascular subsyndrome (NVS) and cutaneous subsyndrome (CS). Major findings in studies meeting inclusion criteria for management strategies for HS were that (i) no randomized controlled studies of medical countermeasures have been (or will likely ever be) performed for ARS cases, (ii) the data for management of HS are restricted by the lack of comparator groups, and (iii) reports of countermeasures for management of injury to non-hematopoietic organs are often incompletely described. Here, (i) recommendations made in Geneva are summarized; (ii) the analysis of countermeasures for HS is updated by review of two additional cases and extended to published reports not meeting inclusion criteria; and (iii) guidelines are provided for management of microbial infections based upon patient risk for prolonged immunosuppression.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Cytokine response in individual from Fleurus, Belgium Accident (2006). Shown are total leukocyte counts over time before and after therapy with pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), erythropoietin (EPO) and recombinant human Stem Cell Factor (rh-SCF). Modified from Gourmelon P et al. (European consensus on the medical management of acute radiation syndrome and analysis of the radiation accidents in Belgium and Senegal. Health Phys 2010;98:825–32).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Summary of clinical management of infections based on time after exposure. Shown are treatment strategies for three arbitrarily designated periods (‘early’, ‘intermediate’ and ‘late’) following exposure to ionizing radiation.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Antibiotics recommended for low-risk patients in the ambulatory (outpatient) and hospitalized (inpatient) settings, based upon Freifield AG et al. (Clinical practice guideline for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2011;52:e56-e93).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Antibiotics recommended for high-risk patients, based upon Freifield AG et al. (Clinical practice guideline for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2011;52:e56-e93).
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Evolution of skin lesion in welder from Yanango, Peru Accident (1999). The individual developed a blister with erythema (Day 2), which evolved into an ulcer of the right thigh, which in turn became infected with an exudative response (Day 27). Purulent necrosis developed (Day 72), requiring surgical management, including amputation of the right lower extremity.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Waselenko JK, MacVittie TJ, Blakeley WF et al. . Medical management of the acute radiation syndrome: recommendations of the Strategic National Stockpile Radiation Working Group. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:1037–51. - PubMed
    1. Coleman CN, Weinstock DM, Casagrande R et al. . Triage and treatment tools for use in a scarce resources-crisis standards of care setting after a nuclear detonation. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 2011;5:S111–21. - PubMed
    1. Albanese J, Skudlarska B, Smith D et al. . Impact of mass casualties resulting from radiation exposure on healthcare systems In: Nriagu JO. (Ed). Encyclopedia Environmental Health, Vol. 3 New York: Elsevier, 2011, 165–77.
    1. Rad Resilient City. A local planning tool to save lives following a nuclear detonation. Center for Biosecurity of UPMC, Baltimore, Maryland, 2011, www.radresilientcity.org (July 20 2017, date last accessed).
    1. White DB, Katz MH, Luce JM et al. . Who should receive life support during a public health emergency? Using ethical principles to improve allocation decisions. Ann Intern Med 2009;150:132–8. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances