Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1987 Mar;34(2):130-4.
doi: 10.1007/BF03015329.

Comparison of fentanyl and butorphanol for outpatient anaesthesia

Clinical Trial

Comparison of fentanyl and butorphanol for outpatient anaesthesia

S K Pandit et al. Can J Anaesth. 1987 Mar.

Abstract

Equianalgesic doses of butorphanol (40 micrograms X kg-1) and fentanyl (2.0 micrograms X kg-1) were compared as supplements to balanced general anaesthesia for outpatient laparoscopic procedures. Thirty-six adult female patients (ASA physical status I or II) participated in the study. The study drugs (butorphanol or fentanyl) were given just prior to induction of anaesthesia in a double-blind fashion. Following induction with a standard dose of thiopentone and tracheal intubation using succinylcholine, nitrous oxide in oxygen and a succinylcholine infusion were used for maintenance of anaesthesia. Seventeen of the 18 patients in the butorphanol group and 14 of the 18 patients in the fentanyl group showed signs of light anaesthesia and required supplementation with isoflurane. Induction, maintenance and recovery characteristics were not different in the two groups except that the post-intubation arterial pressure and heart rate in the fentanyl group were significantly higher than the base line values and the patients receiving butorphanol were more drowsy and also more pain-free in the postoperative period. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was high in both groups. Overall, butorphanol (40 micrograms X kg-1) used as part of a standard balanced general anaesthetic for a standard outpatient procedure was not superior to fentanyl (2 micrograms X kg-1) used in the same fashion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anaesthesia. 1979 Jul-Aug;34(7):633-7 - PubMed
    1. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1965;9(4):223-31 - PubMed
    1. Br J Anaesth. 1984 Jan;56(1):19-27 - PubMed
    1. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1980 Jul;27(4):409-11 - PubMed
    1. Anesthesiology. 1980 Apr;52(4):362-4 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources