Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Sep 7;13(9):1444-1449.
doi: 10.2215/CJN.12641117. Epub 2018 Mar 6.

Regulatory Considerations for Hemodiafiltration in the United States

Affiliations
Review

Regulatory Considerations for Hemodiafiltration in the United States

Richard A Ward et al. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. .

Abstract

Online hemodiafiltration provides greater removal of higher molecular weight uremic retention solutes than conventional high-flux hemodialysis. However, online hemodiafiltration is used sparsely in the United States in part because of a paucity of delivery systems cleared for clinical use by the US Food and Drug Administration. Although a pathway for regulatory approval exists in the United States, concerns remain, particularly regarding online production of the large volumes of sterile, nonpyrogenic substitution fluid infused directly into the bloodstream to maintain fluid balance. Clearly defined testing protocols, acceptable to Food and Drug Administration, will be useful to show that an online hemodiafiltration system is capable of routinely achieving a sterility assurance level of 10-6 and nonpyrogenic levels of endotoxin. Large-scale clinical experience has shown that systems providing this level of performance when combined with certain design features, such as redundancy, and an appropriate quality management process can routinely and safely produce substitution fluid for online hemodiafiltration.

Keywords: Endotoxins; Infertility; Maintenance; Molecular Weight; Online Systems; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration; hemodiafiltration; regulatory approval; renal dialysis; water-electrolyte balance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Use of a validation process to aid in ensuring consistent fluid quality. IQ, installation qualification; OQ, operational qualification; PQ, performance qualification. Reproduced from ref. , with permission.

References

    1. Archdeacon P, Shaffer RN, Winkelmayer WC, Falk RJ, Roy-Chaudhury P: Fostering innovation, advancing patient safety: The kidney health initiative. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 8: 1609–1617, 2013 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Canaud B, Vienken J, Ash S, Ward RA; Kidney Health Initiative HDF Workgroup: Hemodiafiltration to address unmet medical needs in end stage kidney disease patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 13: 1435–1443, 2018 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jaffrin MY, Ding LH, Laurent JM: Simultaneous convective and diffusive mass transfers in a hemodialyser. J Biomech Eng 112: 212–219, 1990 - PubMed
    1. Leypoldt JK: Solute fluxes in different treatment modalities. Nephrol Dial Transplant 15[Suppl 1]: 3–9, 2000 - PubMed
    1. Tattersall JE, Ward RA; EUDIAL group: Online haemodiafiltration: Definition, dose quantification and safety revisited. Nephrol Dial Transplant 28: 542–550, 2013 - PubMed

Publication types