Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb;11(1):18-24.
doi: 10.14740/gr942w. Epub 2018 Feb 23.

Aquanet Bowel Cleansing Device Versus Oral Sodium Picosulfate for Pre-Endoscopy Bowel Preparation: Propensity Score Analysis for Interventional Effectiveness Evaluation

Affiliations

Aquanet Bowel Cleansing Device Versus Oral Sodium Picosulfate for Pre-Endoscopy Bowel Preparation: Propensity Score Analysis for Interventional Effectiveness Evaluation

Roberto L Kaiser Junior et al. Gastroenterology Res. 2018 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Colonoscopy procedures are commonly performed and have high success rates. However, poor or inadequate bowel preparation is one of the most common reasons for a repeated or failed colonoscopy. We therefore performed an observational study followed by propensity score modeling to evaluate and compare the quality of bowel preparation with the use of Aquanet bowel cleansing devices (BCDs) versus the use of oral sodium picosulfate solution.

Methods: We performed a prospective cross-sectional study to compare the quality of pre-endoscopic bowel preparation using a BCD with oral solution. Our major outcome of interest was the quality of bowel preparation as measured through the Boston bowel preparation (BBP) scale. Our main predictor was the method of bowel preparation. The bowel was prepared using either sodium picosulfate or the BCD.

Results: A total of 314 participants were part of this study. The average age of the participants was 54 years and most of the participants were females (81%). Sodium picosulfate was associated with better scores at each segment. After propensity scoring with a 1:1 match and further adjusting for the unbalanced variable (age), we found that despite the apparent superior cleansing performance of sodium picosulfate over the BCD, the difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusion: This study reinforces previous reports regarding the quality, safety and comfort of BCDs, indicating that this technique should be considered for colonoscopy preparation. In the future, randomized controlled trials should be performed to validate these preliminary findings.

Keywords: Aquanet; Bowel cleansing; Clinical study; Propensity score; Sodium picosulfate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Testing for balance after matching.

References

    1. Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, Bond J, Burt R, Ferrucci J, Ganiats T. et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-Update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology. 2003;124(2):544–560. doi: 10.1053/gast.2003.50044. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fayad NF, Kahi CJ. Colonoscopy quality assessment. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2015;25(2):373–386. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2014.11.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boyle P, Leon ME. Epidemiology of colorectal cancer. Br Med Bull. 2002;64:1–25. doi: 10.1093/bmb/64.1.1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH, Ahnen DJ, Garewal H, Chejfec G. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(3):162–168. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200007203430301. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ziv Y, Scapa E. A new colonic lavage system to prepare the colon for colonoscopy: a retrospective study. Tech Coloproctol. 2013;17(1):39–44. doi: 10.1007/s10151-012-0876-8. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources