Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2018 May;63(5):1270-1279.
doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-4997-4. Epub 2018 Mar 7.

Relationship Between Abdominal Symptoms and Fructose Ingestion in Children with Chronic Abdominal Pain

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Relationship Between Abdominal Symptoms and Fructose Ingestion in Children with Chronic Abdominal Pain

Veronika Hammer et al. Dig Dis Sci. 2018 May.

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Limited valid data are available regarding the association of fructose-induced symptoms, fructose malabsorption, and clinical symptoms.

Aim: To develop a questionnaire for valid symptom assessment before and during a carbohydrate breath test and to correlate symptoms with fructose breath test results in children/adolescents with functional abdominal pain.

Methods: A Likert-type questionnaire assessing symptoms considered relevant for hydrogen breath test in children was developed and underwent initial validation. Fructose malabsorption was determined by increased breath hydrogen in 82 pediatric patients with functional abdominal pain disorders; fructose-induced symptoms were quantified by symptom score ≥2 and relevant symptom increase over baseline. The results were correlated with clinical symptoms. The time course of symptoms during the breath test was assessed.

Results: The questionnaire exhibited good psychometric properties in a standardized assessment of the severity of carbohydrate-related symptoms. A total of 40 % (n = 33) had malabsorption; symptoms were induced in 38 % (n = 31), but only 46 % (n = 15) with malabsorption were symptomatic. There was no significant correlation between fructose malabsorption and fructose-induced symptoms. Clinical symptoms correlated with symptoms evoked during the breath test (p < 0.001, r2 = 0.21) but not with malabsorption (NS). Malabsorbers did not differ from non-malabsorbers in terms of symptoms during breath test. Symptomatic patients had significantly higher pain and flatulence scores over the 9-h observation period (p < 0.01) than did nonsymptomatic patients; the meteorism score was higher after 90 min.

Conclusions: Fructose-induced symptoms but not fructose malabsorption are related to increased abdominal symptoms and have distinct timing patterns.

Keywords: Adolescents; Children; Fructose malabsorption; Functional abdominal pain; Hypersensitivity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

No conflicts of interest exist.

Provision of questionnaires

For studies without financial support from industrial sponsors, we provide the questionnaires free of charge.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
End-expiratory breath hydrogen (ppm) over time in fructose malabsorbers who were fructose sensitive and not sensitive to fructose, respectively. Mean ± SEM values are shown
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Global symptom scores in preceding 4 weeks reported by children and adolescents with functional abdominal pain disorders. Median ± 25 and 75 % quartiles are shown. NS, not significant
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Severity of abdominal symptoms in preceding 4 weeks reported by children and adolescents with functional abdominal pain disorders, comparing a patients with and without fructose malabsorption, and b patients with or without sensitivity for fructose. Median ± 25 and 75 % quartiles are shown. p-value <0.01 was considered significant considering multiple comparisons
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Time course of individual symptoms during fructose breath test in children and adolescents with functional abdominal pain disorders with or without sensitivity to fructose. Mean ± SEM values are shown. p-Value <0.01 [difference of symptoms compared with baseline (0 min)] was considered significant considering multiple comparisons. Asterisks denote p value <0.05 (*), <0.01 (**), and <0.001 (***)

References

    1. Chitkara DK, Rawat DJ, Talley NJ. The epidemiology of childhood recurrent abdominal pain in Western countries: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:1868–1875. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41893.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lewis ML, Palsson OS, Whitehead WE, et al. Prevalence of functional gastrointestinal disorders in children and adolescents. J Pediatr. 2016;177:e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.04.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. DiLorenzo C, Hyams J, Saps M, et al. et al. Childhood functional gastrointestinal disorders, child/adolescent. In: Drossman D, Chang L, Chey W, et al.et al., editors. Rome IV, Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders, Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction. Raleigh, NC: The Rome Foundation; 2016. pp. 1297–1371.
    1. Youssef NN, Murphy TG, Langseder AL, Rosh JR. Quality of life for children with functional abdominal pain: a comparison study of patients’ and parents’ perceptions. Pediatrics. 2006;117:54–59. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0114. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zeiter DK. Abdominal pain in children: from the eternal city to the examination room. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2017;64:525–541. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2017.01.012. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms