Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 7;18(1):159.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2955-7.

Teamwork in primary palliative care: general practitioners' and specialised oncology nurses' complementary competencies

Affiliations

Teamwork in primary palliative care: general practitioners' and specialised oncology nurses' complementary competencies

May-Lill Johansen et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Generalists such as general practitioners and district nurses have been the main actors in community palliative care in Norway. Specialised oncology nurses with postgraduate palliative training are increasingly becoming involved. There is little research on their contribution. This study explores how general practitioners (GPs) and oncology nurses (ONs) experience their collaboration in primary palliative care.

Methods: A qualitative focus group and interview study in rural Northern Norway, involving 52 health professionals. Five uni-professional focus group discussions were followed by five interprofessional discussions and six individual interviews. Transcripts were analysed thematically.

Results: The ideal cooperation between GPs and ONs was as a "meeting of experts" with complementary competencies. GPs drew on their generalist backgrounds, including their often long-term relationship with and knowledge of the patient. The ONs contributed longitudinal clinical observations and used their specialised knowledge to make treatment suggestions. While ONs were often experienced and many had developed a form of pattern recognition, they needed GPs' competencies for complex clinical judgements. However, ONs sometimes lacked timely advice from GPs, and could feel left alone with sick patients. To avoid this, some ONs bypassed GPs and contacted palliative specialists directly. While traditional professional hierarchies were not a barrier, we found that organization, funding and remuneration were significant barriers to cooperation. GPs often did not have time to meet with ONs to discuss shared patients. We also found that ONs and GPs had different strategies for learning. While ONs belonged to a networking nursing collective aiming for continuous quality improvement, GPs learned mostly from their individual experience of caring for patients.

Conclusions: The complementary competences and autonomous roles of a specialised nurse and a general practitioner represented a good match for primary palliative care. When planning high-quality teamwork in primary care, organizational barriers to cooperation and different cultures for learning need consideration.

Keywords: General practice; Interprofessional; Palliative care; Teamwork.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

According to Norwegian legislation, this project did not need ethics approval. The Norwegian Centre for Research Data (NSD) has been notified about the project. All participants gave their written consent to participate.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Both authors declare that there are no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

    1. Higginson IJ, Sarmento VP, Calanzani N, Benalia H, Gomes B. Dying at home - is it better: a narrative appraisal of the state of the science. Palliat Med. 2013;27:918–924. doi: 10.1177/0269216313487940. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rainsford S, MacLeod RD, Glasgow NJ. Place of death in rural palliative care: a systematic review. Palliat Med. 2016;30:745–763. doi: 10.1177/0269216316628779. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Woodman C, Baillie J, Sivell S. The preferences and perspectives of family caregivers towards place of care for their relatives at the end-of-life. A systematic review and thematic synthesis of the qualitative evidence. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2015;6:418–429. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2014-000794. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mitchell S, Loew J, Millington-Sanders C, Dale J. Providing end-of-life care in general practice: findings of a national GP questionnaire survey. Br J Gen Pract. 2016;66:e647-e53. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X686113. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pype P, Symons L, Wens J, Van den Eynden B, Stess A, Cherry G, Deveugele M. Healthcare professionals' perceptions toward interprofessional collaboration in palliative home care: a view from Belgium. J Interprof Care. 2013;27:313–319. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2012.745488. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types