Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 7;9(3):383.
doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0421-4.

Synergistic actions of FGF2 and bone marrow transplantation mitigate radiation-induced intestinal injury

Affiliations

Synergistic actions of FGF2 and bone marrow transplantation mitigate radiation-induced intestinal injury

Byoung Hyuck Kim et al. Cell Death Dis. .

Abstract

Unwanted radiological or nuclear exposure remains a public health risk for which effective therapeutic countermeasures are lacking. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF2) in treating radiation-induced gastrointestinal syndrome (RIGS) incurred by lethal whole-body irradiation (WBI) when administered in conjunction with bone marrow transplantation (BMT). In vitro experiments indicated FGF2 treatment increased proliferation, reduced apoptosis, and upregulated AKT-GSK3β/β-catenin signaling in irradiated IEC-6 cells. We next established and analyzed mice cohorts consisting of sham irradiation (Group Sh); 12 Gy WBI (Group A); WBI with BMT (Group B); WBI with FGF2 treatment (Group F); and WBI with BMT and FGF2 treatment (Group BF). At 2 weeks post-irradiation, Group BF showed a dramatic increase in survival over all other groups. Intestinal epithelium of Group BF, but not Group B or F, showed augmented proliferation, decreased apoptosis, and preserved crypt numbers and morphology. Furthermore, Group BF maintained intestinal barrier function with minimal inflammatory disturbances in a manner comparable to Group Sh. In accordance, transcriptomic analyses showed significant upregulation of intestinal barrier and stem cell markers in Group BF relative to Groups A and B. Taken together, parenteral FGF2 synergizes with BMT to confer potent mitigation against RIGS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Evaluation of the radiomitigative effects of various FGF family proteins on irradiated IEC-6 cells.
In all experiments, FGFs were added 30 min after irradiation. Asterisks indicate statistical significance between FGF2 and vehicle. a Clonogenic survival curve for irradiated IEC-6 cells. IEC-6 cells were treated with vehicle (PBS, Gibco), FGF1, FGF2, or FGF19 (each 10 ng/ml) for 24 h after the indicated doses of irradiation. n = 3 in each point. b Cell viability measured by CCK-8 assay 48 h after 2 Gy and 4 Gy irradiation, which were normalized to vehicle-treated group. n = 3 for each group. c Analyses of signaling pathways by Western blot with cell extracts from IEC-6 cells irradiated (4 Gy) and treated with FGFs for 4 h. Data are representative results from at least two independent experiments. Values are mean ± SEM; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Effects of FGF2 injection with or without BMT on clinical parameters of C57BL/6 J mice after 12 Gy WBI.
a Schematics of irradiation, FGF2 injection, BMT, and analyses at various time points. b Kaplan–Meier survival analyses of treatment groups; the number of mice per group and p-value compared with Group BF are shown in parentheses. c Survival time to death of mice that died within 2 weeks post-irradiation. d Body weight trends for mice that died within day 7 post-irradiation; n = 15 in each group. Asterisks indicate statistical significance between Group BF and Group A. e Body weight trends for mice in Group BF and Group B. Body weights of all surviving mice at the time of measurement are reflected in each data point; n = 13 per group on Day 0. Values are mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Effects of FGF2 injection with or without BMT on histologic parameters and intestinal inflammation.
a Representative hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections of mouse small intestine at day 5 post-irradiation. Magnification ×40 (first row, scale bar 500 μm), ×200 (second row, scale bar 100 μm), and ×400 (third row, scale bar 50 μm). b Quantification of crypt counts per circumference, villi height, and basal lamina length. n = 5 in each group. c Intestinal IL-1α and IL-6 levels were measured in tissue lysates obtained at day 3 post-irradiation. Values are means ± SEM; n = 4 in each group. d In vivo intestinal permeability was determined by FITC–dextran serum concentration at 4 h after oral gavage; day 3 post-irradiation, n = 3 in each group. e Cldn15, Epcam, and Vil1 expression levels at day 3 post-irradiation; n = 4 in each group. Values are mean ± SEM; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Effects of FGF2 treatment combined with BMT on intestinal crypt proliferation, apoptosis, and LGR5 expression.
a BrdU incorporation measured by immunohistochemistry (magnification ×200, scale bar 100 μm) at day 5 post-irradiation. b Quantification of BrdU-positive crypts per circumference. At least five circumferences per mouse were counted; n = 3 in each group. c Ki-67 and TUNEL immunofluorescence staining (Ki-67: magnification ×400, scale bar 50 μm; TUNEL: magnification ×1000, scale bar 20 μm). d, e Quantification of Ki67- and TUNEL-positive cells per crypt at day 5 post-irradiation. At least 10 well-oriented crypts per mouse were counted; n = 3 in each group. f Intestinal tissue lysates were examined by Western blot at day 3 post-irradiation. α-tubulin was used as the loading control and LC3B was used as the positive control for radiation damage (autophagy). Data are representative results from at least two independent experiments. g Lgr5 and Axin2 expression levels at day 3 post-irradiation; n = 3 in each group. Values are mean ± SEM; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Effects of FGF2 treatment combined with BMT on radiation-induced alterations of serum cytokines.
Serum cytokine profiles from mice on day 3 and day 5 post-irradiation. a IL-10. b TNFα. c IL-4. d IL-6. n = 3–6 in each group. Values are mean ± SEM; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. FGF2 treatment reveals transcriptomic signatures of reduced inflammation and restoration of intestinal tissue homeostasis in radiation-damaged intestines.
a Heatmap of differentially expressed genes in intestinal tissue from indicated treatment groups (day 5 post-irradiation). Intestinal tissue RNA samples from three mice in each treatment group were pooled together for RNA sequencing. Red indicates higher normalized expression levels and green indicates lower expression levels. b Number of upregulated and downregulated genes (≥twofold change) between indicated treatment groups. c Heatmap of genes involved in intestinal tissue homeostasis and tissue inflammation. d qPCR validation of select genes from (c). n = 3 in each group. Values are mean ± SEM; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Weiss W. Radiological protection issues arising during and after the Fukushima nuclear reactor accident-memorandum of TG 84 of ICRP. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2016;171:20–22. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncw188. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Imanaka T, Hayashi G, Endo S. Comparison of the accident process, radioactivity release and ground contamination between Chernobyl and Fukushima-1. J. Radiat. Res. 2015;56:i56–i61. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrv074. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Drouet M, Hérodin F. Radiation victim management and the haematologist in the future: time to revisit therapeutic guidelines? Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2010;86:636–648. doi: 10.3109/09553001003789604. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hérodin F, Drouet M. Cytokine-based treatment of accidentally irradiated victims and new approaches. Exp. Hematol. 2005;33:1071–1080. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2005.04.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Williams JP, McBride WH. After the bomb drops: a new look at radiation-induced multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2011;87:851–868. doi: 10.3109/09553002.2011.560996. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances