Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Feb 21;9(1):77-102.
doi: 10.1007/s13167-018-0128-8. eCollection 2018 Mar.

The crucial role of multiomic approach in cancer research and clinically relevant outcomes

Affiliations
Review

The crucial role of multiomic approach in cancer research and clinically relevant outcomes

Miaolong Lu et al. EPMA J. .

Abstract

Cancer with heavily economic and social burden is the hot point in the field of medical research. Some remarkable achievements have been made; however, the exact mechanisms of tumor initiation and development remain unclear. Cancer is a complex, whole-body disease that involves multiple abnormalities in the levels of DNA, RNA, protein, metabolite and medical imaging. Biological omics including genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics and radiomics aims to systematically understand carcinogenesis in different biological levels, which is driving the shift of cancer research paradigm from single parameter model to multi-parameter systematical model. The rapid development of various omics technologies is driving one to conveniently get multi-omics data, which accelerates predictive, preventive and personalized medicine (PPPM) practice allowing prediction of response with substantially increased accuracy, stratification of particular patients and eventual personalization of medicine. This review article describes the methodology, advances, and clinically relevant outcomes of different "omics" technologies in cancer research, and especially emphasizes the importance and scientific merit of integrating multi-omics in cancer research and clinically relevant outcomes.

Keywords: Cancer; Multi-omics; Personalization of medical services; Predictive, preventive medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Compliance with ethical standardsThe authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this article.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Multiomics and PPPM in cancer
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The general workflow of RNA-seq. EST: expressed sequence tag
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The MS-based proteomics workflow. 2DGE: two-dimensional gel electrophoresis; MS: mass spectrometry; MS/MS: tandem mass spectrometry; and LC: liquid chromatography
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The general workflow of radiomics

References

    1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:87–108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tran B, Dancey JE, Kamel-Reid S, McPherson JD, Bedard PL, Brown AM, et al. Cancer genomics: technology, discovery, and translation. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:647–660. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.2316. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Horgan RP, Kenny LC. ‘Omic’ technologies: genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics. Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;13:189–195.
    1. Chmielecki J, Meyerson M. DNA sequencing of cancer: what have we learned? Annu Rev Med. 2014;65:63–79. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-060712-200152. - DOI - PubMed