Comparison of complications in the conventional telescopic Herbst rod and tube and Manni telescopic Herbst: A retrospective clinical study
- PMID: 29517275
- PMCID: PMC8191925
- DOI: 10.2319/082317-569.1
Comparison of complications in the conventional telescopic Herbst rod and tube and Manni telescopic Herbst: A retrospective clinical study
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the prevalence of clinical complications between two different telescopic Herbst systems: the conventional telescopic system, with traditional rod and tube (RMS), and the Manni telescopic Herbst appliance (MTH).
Materials and methods: Ninety subjects treated with RMS were compared to 89 patients treated with MTH. All of the complications that occurred were reported, and percentages of prevalence were calculated.
Results: MTH showed a significantly lower percentage of reversible complications (that did not require appliance removal) when compared to the reversible complications during RMS treatment (20.2% vs 51.1%). No statistically significant differences were found between RMS and MTH regarding irreversible complications (that required appliance removal and full re-make). All of the irreversible complications occurred after reversible complications in the RMS group, while most of the irreversible complications in the MTH group occurred without any previous reversible complication.
Conclusions: MTH exhibited a smaller number of clinical complications during Class II skeletal malocclusion therapy.
Keywords: Complications; Herbst; MTH; RMS.
Figures






References
-
- Pancherz H. The Herbst appliance—its biologic effects and clinical use. Am J Orthod. 1985;87:1–20. - PubMed
-
- Pancherz H. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod. 1982;82:104–113. - PubMed
-
- Herbst E. Atlas und Grundiss der Zahnarztlichen Orthopadie. Munchen, Germany: J.F. Lehmann Verlag; 1910.
-
- O'Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, et al. Effectiveness of treatment for Class II malocclusion with the Herbst or twin-block appliances: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124:128–137. - PubMed
-
- Ruf S, Pancherz H. Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion in early and late adulthood. A prospective cephalometric study of consecutively treated subjects. Eur J Orthod. 2006;28:352–360. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources