Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr 19;9(2):e0012.
doi: 10.5041/RMMJ.10332.

Temporal Trends (1999-2015) in the Impact Factor of Biomedical Journals Published by US and EU Scientific Societies

Matthew E Falagas  1   2   3 , Margarita Kyriakidou  1   4 , George Spais  3 , Efstathia Argiti  1 , Konstantinos Z Vardakas  1   2
Affiliations

Temporal Trends (1999-2015) in the Impact Factor of Biomedical Journals Published by US and EU Scientific Societies

Matthew E Falagas et al. Rambam Maimonides Med J. .

Abstract

Objective: The impact factor has emerged as the most popular index of scientific journals' resonance. In this study we aimed to examine the impact factor trends of journals published by scientific bodies in the United States of America (USA) and Europe (EU).

Methods: We randomly chose 11 categories of Journal of Citation Reports and created three research classes: clinical medicine, laboratory medicine, and basic science. The impact factor values for the years 1999-2015 were abstracted, and the impact factor of US and EU journals was studied through the years.

Results: A total of 265 journals were included in the final analysis. The impact factor of US journals was higher than that of EU journals throughout the study period. In addition, for both US and EU journals the median impact factor increased throughout the study period. The rate of annual change in the impact factor throughout the study period was lower for US than EU journals (1.85% versus 3.55%, P=0.019). A higher median annual increase was seen in the impact factor during the period 1999-2008 compared to the period 2009-2015 for both US (P<0.001) and EU (P=0.001) journals. In fact, during the second period the US median impact factor value did not show significant changes (P=0.31), while the EU median impact factor continued to increase (P<0.001).

Conclusion: The impact factor of EU journals increased at a significantly higher rate than and approached that of the US journals during the last 16 years.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Impact Factor Trends of US and EU Journals during the Study Period (1999–2015)
A: All journals. B: Clinical medicine journals. C: Laboratory medicine journals. D: Basic science journals.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vardakas KZ, Tsopanakis G, Poulopoulou A, Falagas ME. An analysis of factors contributing to PubMed’s growth. J Informetr. 2014;9:592–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.06.001. - DOI
    1. Ramin S, Sarraf Shirazi A. Comparison between Impact factor, SCImago journal rank indicator and Eigenfactor score of nuclear medicine journals. Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur. 2012;15:132–6. - PubMed
    1. Joshi MA. Bibliometric indicators for evaluating the quality of scientific publications. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014;15:258–62. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1525. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Time to remodel the journal impact factor. Nature. 2016;535:466. https://doi.org/10.1038/535466a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Callaway E. Beat it, impact factor! Publishing elite turns against controversial metric. Nature. 2016;535:210–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2016.20224. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources