Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 8;10(3):327.
doi: 10.3390/nu10030327.

Poor Dietary Guidelines Compliance among Low-Income Women Eligible for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-Education (SNAP-Ed)

Affiliations

Poor Dietary Guidelines Compliance among Low-Income Women Eligible for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-Education (SNAP-Ed)

Shinyoung Jun et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-Education (SNAP-Ed) program aims to improve nutritional intakes of low-income individuals (<185% poverty threshold). The objective of this study was to describe the compliance with Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA) recommendations for fruits, vegetables, and whole grains among SNAP-Ed eligible (n = 3142) and ineligible (n = 3168) adult women (19-70 years) nationwide and SNAP-Ed participating women in Indiana (n = 2623), using the NHANES 2007-2012 and Indiana SNAP-Ed survey data, respectively. Sensitivity analysis further stratified women by race/ethnicity and by current SNAP participation (<130% poverty threshold). Nationally, lower-income women were less likely to meet the fruit (21% vs. 25%) and vegetable (11% vs. 19%) guidelines than higher-income women, but did not differ on whole grains, which were ~5% regardless of income. The income differences in fruit and vegetable intakes were driven by non-Hispanic whites. Fewer SNAP-Ed-eligible U.S. women met fruit (21% vs. 55%) and whole grain (4% vs. 18%) but did not differ for vegetable recommendations (11% vs. 9%) when compared to Indiana SNAP-Ed women. This same trend was observed among current SNAP participants. Different racial/ethnic group relationships with DGA compliance were found in Indiana compared to the nation. Nevertheless, most low-income women in the U.S. are at risk of not meeting DGA recommendations for fruits (79%), vegetables (89%), and whole grains (96%); SNAP-Ed participants in Indiana had higher compliance with DGA recommendations. Increased consumption of these three critical food groups would improve nutrient density, likely reduce calorie consumption by replacing high calorie choices, and improve fiber intakes.

Keywords: Dietary Guidelines; NHANES; SNAP; SNAP-Education; diet disparities; fruit; low-income; nutrition; vegetable; whole grain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The percentage meeting the Dietary Guidelines for American recommendations of SNAP-Ed eligible and SNAP-Ed ineligible women nationwide, NHANES 2007–2012. (a) All (b) White (c) Black (d) Hispanic/Mexican American. Fruit and vegetable intakes are measured in cup equivalents and whole grain intake is measured in ounce equivalents. * Significantly different between SNAP-Ed eligible and SNAP-Ed ineligible women nationwide based on t-tests. Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. U.S. Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Education Plan Guidance FY 2018. [(accessed on 20 November 2017)]; Available online: https://snaped.fns.usda.gov/snap/Guidance/FY2018SNAP-EdPlanGuidance.pdf.
    1. Savoie M.R., Mispireta M., Rankin L.L., Neill K., LeBlanc H., Christofferson D. Intention to change nutrition-related behaviors in adult participants of a Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-Education. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 2015;47:81–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2014.08.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Williams P.A., Cates S.C., Blitstein J.L., Hersey J.C., Kosa K.M., Long V.A., Singh A., Berman D. Evaluating the Impact of Six Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Education Interventions on Children’s At-Home Diets. Health Educ. Behav. 2015;42:329–338. doi: 10.1177/1090198114558589. - DOI - PubMed
    1. U.S. Department of Agriculture Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2015–2020. [(accessed on 20 November 2017)]; Available online: https://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015/resources/2015-2020_Dietary_Gu....
    1. McGill C.R., Fulgoni V.L., III, Devareddy L. Ten-year trends in fiber and whole grain intakes and food sources for the United States population: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2001–2010. Nutrients. 2015;7:1119–1130. doi: 10.3390/nu7021119. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources