The performance of human papillomavirus DNA detection with type 16/18 genotyping by hybrid capture in primary test of cervical cancer screening: a cross-sectional study in 10,669 Chinese women
- PMID: 29518562
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.02.027
The performance of human papillomavirus DNA detection with type 16/18 genotyping by hybrid capture in primary test of cervical cancer screening: a cross-sectional study in 10,669 Chinese women
Abstract
Objectives: We aimed to assess the performance of DH3 human papillomavirus (HPV) assay, a newly developed hybrid capture technique that detects 14 high-risk HPVs with type 16/18 genotyping, as a primary test in cervical cancer screening.
Methods: In total 11,356 Chinese women aged 21-65 years participated in a cervical cancer screening programme using cytology (Thinprep, Hologic) and HPV testing (Cobas 4800 Test, Roche). Residual samples were used to detect HPV by DH3 HPV.
Results: In total 10,669 women with valid results were included in the study. Of those, 135 were diagnosed as CIN2+, and 83 were diagnosed as CIN3+; 1056 women (9.9%) were DH3 HPV-positive and 255 (2.4%) of those were 16/18-positive, while 990 (9.3%) women were Cobas HPV-positive and 243 (2.3%) of those were 16/18-positive. DH3 HPV was non-inferior to Cobas HPV in identifying CIN1- and CIN2+ using predetermined thresholds (both p < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of DH3 HPV were 93.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 87.7-96.9), 91.2% (95%CI = 90.6-91.7), 12.0% (95%CI = 10.1-14.1) and 99.9% (95%CI = 99.8-100), respectively, similar to those of Cobas HPV (91.1%, 95%CI = 85.0-5.3; 91.8%, 95%CI = 91.2-92.3; 12.5%, 95%CI = 10.5-14.7; and 99.9%, 95%CI = 99.8-99.9, respectively), in identifying CIN2+ (all p > 0.05). When DH3 HPV and Cobas HPV were respectively used as primary testing in screening strategy, the performance of two strategies were similar in identifying CIN2+. The results were similar in identifying CIN3+.
Conclusion: Our data suggest that DH3 HPV performs similarly to Cobas HPV in identifying high-grade CIN in cervical cancer screening.
Keywords: 16/18 genotyping; Cervical cancer; Cervical cancer screening; Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; Human papillomavirus DNA; Hybrid capture.
Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Head-to-Head Comparison of DH3 HPV Test and HC2 Assay for Detection of High-Risk HPV Infection in Residual Cytology Samples from Cervical Cancer Screening Setting: Baseline and 3-Year Longitudinal Data.Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0157021. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01570-21. Epub 2022 Feb 16. Microbiol Spectr. 2022. PMID: 35171029 Free PMC article.
-
Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.Lancet Oncol. 2011 Sep;12(9):880-90. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70188-7. Epub 2011 Aug 22. Lancet Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21865084 Clinical Trial.
-
A cross-sectional study on HPV testing with type 16/18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening in 11,064 Chinese women.Cancer Med. 2017 May;6(5):1091-1101. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1060. Epub 2017 Apr 4. Cancer Med. 2017. PMID: 28378404 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence and distribution of human papillomavirus genotypes in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in China: a meta-analysis.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Dec;302(6):1329-1337. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05787-w. Epub 2020 Sep 10. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020. PMID: 32914222 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Predictable changes in the accuracy of human papillomavirus tests after vaccination: review with implications for performance monitoring in cervical screening.Br J Cancer. 2024 May;130(11):1733-1743. doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02681-z. Epub 2024 Apr 13. Br J Cancer. 2024. PMID: 38615108 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of cervical cancer screening models based on Pap and HPV tests in Tbilisi, Georgia.Cent Eur J Public Health. 2024 Sep;32(3):166-172. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a8014. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39352091
-
Head-to-Head Comparison of DH3 HPV Test and HC2 Assay for Detection of High-Risk HPV Infection in Residual Cytology Samples from Cervical Cancer Screening Setting: Baseline and 3-Year Longitudinal Data.Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0157021. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01570-21. Epub 2022 Feb 16. Microbiol Spectr. 2022. PMID: 35171029 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness and accuracy of cervical cancer screening with a high-risk HPV genotyping assay vs a nongenotyping assay in China: an observational cohort study.Cancer Cell Int. 2020 Aug 28;20:421. doi: 10.1186/s12935-020-01512-4. eCollection 2020. Cancer Cell Int. 2020. PMID: 32868973 Free PMC article.
-
The Risk Stratification for Cervical Cancer and Precursors of Domestic HPV Testing With HPV 16/18 Genotyping in Women With NILM Cytology in CentralChina: A Cohort Study.Front Oncol. 2021 Oct 4;11:716762. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.716762. eCollection 2021. Front Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34671550 Free PMC article.
-
Electrochemical Strategy for Low-Cost Viral Detection.ACS Cent Sci. 2021 Jun 23;7(6):963-972. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.1c00186. Epub 2021 May 12. ACS Cent Sci. 2021. PMID: 34235257 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical