Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 8;10(1):10.
doi: 10.1186/s13321-018-0263-1.

OPERA models for predicting physicochemical properties and environmental fate endpoints

Affiliations

OPERA models for predicting physicochemical properties and environmental fate endpoints

Kamel Mansouri et al. J Cheminform. .

Abstract

The collection of chemical structure information and associated experimental data for quantitative structure-activity/property relationship (QSAR/QSPR) modeling is facilitated by an increasing number of public databases containing large amounts of useful data. However, the performance of QSAR models highly depends on the quality of the data and modeling methodology used. This study aims to develop robust QSAR/QSPR models for chemical properties of environmental interest that can be used for regulatory purposes. This study primarily uses data from the publicly available PHYSPROP database consisting of a set of 13 common physicochemical and environmental fate properties. These datasets have undergone extensive curation using an automated workflow to select only high-quality data, and the chemical structures were standardized prior to calculation of the molecular descriptors. The modeling procedure was developed based on the five Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) principles for QSAR models. A weighted k-nearest neighbor approach was adopted using a minimum number of required descriptors calculated using PaDEL, an open-source software. The genetic algorithms selected only the most pertinent and mechanistically interpretable descriptors (2-15, with an average of 11 descriptors). The sizes of the modeled datasets varied from 150 chemicals for biodegradability half-life to 14,050 chemicals for logP, with an average of 3222 chemicals across all endpoints. The optimal models were built on randomly selected training sets (75%) and validated using fivefold cross-validation (CV) and test sets (25%). The CV Q2 of the models varied from 0.72 to 0.95, with an average of 0.86 and an R2 test value from 0.71 to 0.96, with an average of 0.82. Modeling and performance details are described in QSAR model reporting format and were validated by the European Commission's Joint Research Center to be OECD compliant. All models are freely available as an open-source, command-line application called OPEn structure-activity/property Relationship App (OPERA). OPERA models were applied to more than 750,000 chemicals to produce freely available predicted data on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's CompTox Chemistry Dashboard.

Keywords: Environmental fate; Model validation; OECD principles; OPERA; Open data; Open source; Physicochemical properties; QMRF; QSAR/QSPR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Distribution of experimental logP values between training and test sets
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Results search header for atrazine on the CompTox Chemistry Dashboard
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Summary view of experimental and predicted physicochemical properties
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Melting Point (MP) experimental and predicted values from different sources
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
OPERA prediction calculation report for the melting point of bisphenol A
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Experimental and predicted values for training and test set of OPERA logP model
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
LogP predictions for KOWWIN model. The overestimated cluster selected for comparison is highlighted in a red ellipse
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
LogP predictions for KOWWIN model in purple stars compared to OPERA model in green circles

References

    1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) Chemical Reviews and Tools Case Study. http://www.who.int/ifcs/documents/forums/forum5/precaution/epa_en.pdf. Accessed 18 Aug 2017
    1. EPA (2015) Chemicals under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). https://www.epa.gov/chemicals-under-tsca. Accessed 18 Aug 2017
    1. Egeghy PP, Judson R, Gangwal S, et al. The exposure data landscape for manufactured chemicals. Sci Total Environ. 2012;414:159–166. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.10.046. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Judson RS, Martin MT, Egeghy P, et al. Aggregating data for computational toxicology applications: the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Aggregated Computational Toxicology Resource (ACToR) System. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13:1805–1831. doi: 10.3390/ijms13021805. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Judson R, Richard A, Dix D, et al. ACToR-aggregated computational toxicology resource. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2008;233:7–13. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2007.12.037. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources