Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May;59(3):261-271.
doi: 10.1111/vru.12608. Epub 2018 Mar 9.

Consensus recommendations on standardized magnetic resonance imaging protocols for multicenter canine brain tumor clinical trials

Affiliations

Consensus recommendations on standardized magnetic resonance imaging protocols for multicenter canine brain tumor clinical trials

Rebecca A Packer et al. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2018 May.

Erratum in

Abstract

The National Cancer Institute Comparative Brain Tumor Consortium, Patient Outcomes Working Group, propose a consensus document in support of standardized magnetic resonance imaging protocols for canine brain tumor clinical trials. The intent of this manuscript is to address the widely acknowledged need to ensure canine brain tumor imaging protocols are relevant and have sufficient equivalency to translate to human studies such that: (1) multi-institutional studies can be performed with minimal inter-institutional variation, and (2) imaging protocols are consistent with human consensus recommendations to permit reliable translation of imaging data to human clinical trials. Consensus recommendations include pre- and postcontrast three-dimensional T1-weighted images, T2-weighted turbo spin echo in all three planes, T2*-weighted gradient recalled echo, T2-weighted fluid attenuated inversion recovery, and diffusion weighted imaging/diffusion tensor imaging in transverse plane; field of view of ≤150 mm; slice thickness of ≤2 mm, matrix ≥ 256 for two-dimensional images, and 150 or 256 for three-dimensional images.

Keywords: brain; clinical trials; consensus; magnetic resonance imaging; tumors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. LeBlanc AK, Mazcko C, Brown DE, et al. Creation of an NCI comparative brain tumor consortium: informing the translation of new knowledge from canine to human brain tumor patients. Neuro Oncol. 2016;18:1209–1218. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stroud C, Dmitriev I, Kashentseva E, et al. A One Health overview, facilitating advances in comparative medicine and translational research. Clin Transl Med. 2016;5(Suppl 1):26. - PMC - PubMed
    1. LeBlanc AK, Mazcko CN, Khanna C. Defining the value of a comparative approach to cancer drug development. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:2133–2138. - PMC - PubMed
    1. LeBlanc AK, Breen M, Choyke P, et al. Perspectives from man's best friend: National Academy of Medicine's workshop on comparative oncology. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8:324ps325. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ellingson BM, Bendszus M, Boxerman J, et al. Consensus recommendations for a standardized brain tumor imaging protocol in clinical trials. Neuro Oncol. 2015;17:1188–1198. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms