Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 9;7(3):e79.
doi: 10.2196/resprot.9095.

The Physiological Bases of Hidden Noise-Induced Hearing Loss: Protocol for a Functional Neuroimaging Study

Affiliations

The Physiological Bases of Hidden Noise-Induced Hearing Loss: Protocol for a Functional Neuroimaging Study

Rebecca Susan Dewey et al. JMIR Res Protoc. .

Abstract

Background: Rodent studies indicate that noise exposure can cause permanent damage to synapses between inner hair cells and high-threshold auditory nerve fibers, without permanently altering threshold sensitivity. These demonstrations of what is commonly known as hidden hearing loss have been confirmed in several rodent species, but the implications for human hearing are unclear.

Objective: Our Medical Research Council-funded program aims to address this unanswered question, by investigating functional consequences of the damage to the human peripheral and central auditory nervous system that results from cumulative lifetime noise exposure. Behavioral and neuroimaging techniques are being used in a series of parallel studies aimed at detecting hidden hearing loss in humans. The planned neuroimaging study aims to (1) identify central auditory biomarkers associated with hidden hearing loss; (2) investigate whether there are any additive contributions from tinnitus or diminished sound tolerance, which are often comorbid with hearing problems; and (3) explore the relation between subcortical functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) measures and the auditory brainstem response (ABR).

Methods: Individuals aged 25 to 40 years with pure tone hearing thresholds ≤20 dB hearing level over the range 500 Hz to 8 kHz and no contraindications for MRI or signs of ear disease will be recruited into the study. Lifetime noise exposure will be estimated using an in-depth structured interview. Auditory responses throughout the central auditory system will be recorded using ABR and fMRI. Analyses will focus predominantly on correlations between lifetime noise exposure and auditory response characteristics.

Results: This paper reports the study protocol. The funding was awarded in July 2013. Enrollment for the study described in this protocol commenced in February 2017 and was completed in December 2017. Results are expected in 2018.

Conclusions: This challenging and comprehensive study will have the potential to impact diagnostic procedures for hidden hearing loss, enabling early identification of noise-induced auditory damage via the detection of changes in central auditory processing. Consequently, this will generate the opportunity to give personalized advice regarding provision of ear defense and monitoring of further damage, thus reducing the incidence of noise-induced hearing loss.

Keywords: auditory brain stem response; auditory pathways; functional magnetic resonance imaging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol used in the study. fMRI: functional magnetic resonance imaging; TE: echo time; FLASH: fast low angle shot; MPRAGE: magnetization prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The effect of echo-planar imaging (EPI) distortion correction on the image. An uncorrected, distorted EPI (left) and corrected image (right).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Calculation of total noise exposure units, where Y is the number of years of exposure, W the number of weeks per year of exposure, D the number of days per week of exposure, H the number of hours per day of exposure, L the level of exposure, in dB (A), as estimated by the participant, A the attenuation of hearing protective equipment (dB), and P the proportion of time protective equipment was worn, between 0 and 1.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization. 1997. [2018-02-24]. Prevention of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss http://www.who.int/pbd/deafness/activities/strategies/en/
    1. World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe. 2011. [2018-02-21]. Burden of disease from environmental noise. Quantification of healthy life years lost in Europe http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/136466/e94888.pdf .
    1. Lutman ME, Davis AC, Ferguson MA. Health and Safety Executive. 2008. [2018-02-24]. Epidemiological evidence for the effectiveness of the noise at work regulations http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrpdf/rr669.pdf .
    1. European Commission. 2008. [2018-02-21]. Potential health risks of exposure to noise from personal music players and mobile phones including a music playing function Preliminary report http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_scenihr/docs/scenihr_o_... .
    1. Eggermont JJ. Effects of long-term non-traumatic noise exposure on the adult central auditory system. Hearing problems without hearing loss. Hear Res. 2017 Sep;352:12–22. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.10.015. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources