Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 1;7(3):231-243.
doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.79.

Using Complexity and Network Concepts to Inform Healthcare Knowledge Translation

Affiliations

Using Complexity and Network Concepts to Inform Healthcare Knowledge Translation

Alison Kitson et al. Int J Health Policy Manag. .

Abstract

Many representations of the movement of healthcare knowledge through society exist, and multiple models for the translation of evidence into policy and practice have been articulated. Most are linear or cyclical and very few come close to reflecting the dense and intricate relationships, systems and politics of organizations and the processes required to enact sustainable improvements. We illustrate how using complexity and network concepts can better inform knowledge translation (KT) and argue that changing the way we think and talk about KT could enhance the creation and movement of knowledge throughout those systems needing to develop and utilise it. From our theoretical refinement, we propose that KT is a complex network composed of five interdependent sub-networks, or clusters, of key processes (problem identification [PI], knowledge creation [KC], knowledge synthesis [KS], implementation [I], and evaluation [E]) that interact dynamically in different ways at different times across one or more sectors (community; health; government; education; research for example). We call this the KT Complexity Network, defined as a network that optimises the effective, appropriate and timely creation and movement of knowledge to those who need it in order to improve what they do. Activation within and throughout any one of these processes and systems depends upon the agents promoting the change, successfully working across and between multiple systems and clusters. The case is presented for moving to a way of thinking about KT using complexity and network concepts. This extends the thinking that is developing around integrated KT approaches. There are a number of policy and practice implications that need to be considered in light of this shift in thinking.

Keywords: Complex Adaptive Systems (CASs); Complexity; Evidence-Based Practice; Implementation Science; Integrated Knowledge Translation; Knowledge Translation (KT); Networks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 5

Comment in

References

    1. Schuster M, McGlynn E, Brook R. How good is the quality of health care in the United States? Milbank Q. 1998;76:517–563. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sung NS, Crowley WF, Genel M. et al. Central challenges facing the National Clinical Research Enterprise. J Am Med Assoc. 2003;10(10):1278–1287. - PubMed
    1. Runciman WB, Coiera EW, Day RO. et al. Towards the delivery of appropriate health care in Australia. Med J Aust. 2012;197(2):78–81. - PubMed
    1. Kline SJ, Rosenberg N. An overview of Innovation. In: Landau R, Rosenberg N, eds. The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth. National Academies Press; 1986:275-305.
    1. Haines A, Jones R. Implementing findings of research. Br Med J. 1994;308:1488–1492. - PMC - PubMed