Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul;37(7):1963-1969.
doi: 10.1007/s10067-018-4063-9. Epub 2018 Mar 10.

Influence of the different "patient global assessment" formulations on disease activity score by different indices in rheumatoid arthritis

Affiliations
Free article

Influence of the different "patient global assessment" formulations on disease activity score by different indices in rheumatoid arthritis

Ricardo J O Ferreira et al. Clin Rheumatol. 2018 Jul.
Free article

Abstract

Patient global assessment (PGA) is included in almost all rheumatoid arthritis (RA) composite disease activity indices and definitions of remission. However, different PGA formulations exist and are used interchangeably in research and clinical practice. We investigated how five different PGA formulations used in four disease indices affect the remission rates. This was an ancillary analysis of data from a cross-sectional study in patients with RA. The data comprised the following: 28-joint counts, C-reactive protein, and five PGA formulations. Remission rate variation was assessed using five PGA formulations in each index (ACR/EULAR Boolean, CDAI, SDAI, and DAS28-CRP). PGA agreement was assessed by the following: Pearson's correlation; Bland-Altman plots; paired samples t test; and establishing the proportion of patients who scored (i) all formulations within an interval of 20 mm and (ii) each formulation ≤ 10 mm. This analysis included 191 patients. PGA formulations presented good correlations (≥ 0.65), but Bland-Altman plots showed clinically significant differences, which were statistically confirmed by comparison of means. Just over a half (51.8%) of patients scored all PGA formulations within a 20-mm interval. The proportion of those scoring ≤ 10 mm varied from 11.5 to 16.2%. When different formulations of PGA were used in each index, remission differences of up to 4.7, 4.7, 6.3, and 5.2% were observed. When formulations were used in their respective indices, as validated, the remission rates were similar (13.1, 13.6, 14.1, and 18.3%). Using PGA formulations interchangeably may have implications in the assessment of disease activity and in the attainment of remission, and this can impact upon management decisions.

Keywords: Disease activity; Patient global assessment; Patient preference; Patient reported outcome measures; Remission induction; Rheumatoid arthritis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Musculoskeletal Care. 2013 Dec;11(4):229-37 - PubMed
    1. J Rheumatol. 2010 Apr;37(4):717-22 - PubMed
    1. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Mar;70(3):369-378 - PubMed
    1. Arthritis Res Ther. 2005;7(4):R796-806 - PubMed
    1. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2015 Feb;54(2):286-91 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources