Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb 2:9:138-143.
doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.01.004. eCollection 2018 Mar.

Identifying quality improvement targets to facilitate colorectal cancer screening completion

Affiliations

Identifying quality improvement targets to facilitate colorectal cancer screening completion

Simon J Craddock Lee et al. Prev Med Rep. .

Abstract

The colorectal cancer (CRC) screening process involves multiple interfaces (communication exchanges and transfers of responsibility for specific actions) among primary care and gastroenterology providers, laboratory, and administrative staff. After a retrospective electronic health record (EHR) analysis discovered substantial clinic variation and low CRC screening prevalence overall in an urban, integrated safety-net system, we launched a qualitative analysis to identify potential quality improvement targets to enhance fecal immunochemical test (FIT) completion, the system's preferred screening modality. Here, we report examination of organization-, clinic-, and provider-level interfaces over a three-year period (December 2011-October 2014). We deployed in parallel 3 qualitative data collection methods: (1) structured observation (90+ hours, 10 sites); (2) document analysis (n > 100); and (3) semi-structured interviews (n = 41) and conducted iterative thematic analysis in which findings from each method cross-informed subsequent data collection. Thematic analysis was guided by a conceptual model and applied deductive and inductive codes. There was substantial variation in protocols for distributing and returning FIT kits both within and across clinics. Providers, clinic and laboratory staff had differing access to important data about FIT results based on clinical information system used and this affected results reporting. Communication and coordination during electronic referrals for diagnostic colonoscopy was suboptimal particularly for co-morbid patients needing anesthesia clearance. Our multi-level approach elucidated organizational deficiencies not evident by quantitative analysis alone. Findings indicate potential quality improvement intervention targets including: (1) best-practices implementation across clinics; (2) detailed communication to providers about FIT results; and (3) creation of EHR alerts to resolve pending colonoscopy referrals before they expire.

Keywords: Cancer screening; Evaluation methodology; Health services research; Information technology; Qualitative research; Quality improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Allison J.E., Sakoda L.C., Levin T.R. Screening for colorectal neoplasms with new fecal occult blood tests: update on performance characteristics. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2007;99(19):1462–1470. - PubMed
    1. American Cancer Society American Cancer Society Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer Early Detection. 2015. http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/cid/documents/webcontent/003170-pdf.pdf
    1. American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:1004–1017. - PubMed
    1. Bayliss E.A., Balasubramianian B.A., Gill J.M., Stange K.C. Perspectives in primary care: implementing patient-centered care coordination for individuals with multiple chronic medical conditions. Ann. Fam. Med. 2014;12(6):500–503. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bazargan M., Ani C., Bazargan-Hejazi S., Baker R.S., Bastani R. Colorectal cancer screening among underserved minority population: discrepancy between physicians' recommended, scheduled, and completed tests. Patient Educ. Couns. 2009;76(2):240–247. - PubMed