Identifying quality improvement targets to facilitate colorectal cancer screening completion
- PMID: 29527466
- PMCID: PMC5840842
- DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.01.004
Identifying quality improvement targets to facilitate colorectal cancer screening completion
Abstract
The colorectal cancer (CRC) screening process involves multiple interfaces (communication exchanges and transfers of responsibility for specific actions) among primary care and gastroenterology providers, laboratory, and administrative staff. After a retrospective electronic health record (EHR) analysis discovered substantial clinic variation and low CRC screening prevalence overall in an urban, integrated safety-net system, we launched a qualitative analysis to identify potential quality improvement targets to enhance fecal immunochemical test (FIT) completion, the system's preferred screening modality. Here, we report examination of organization-, clinic-, and provider-level interfaces over a three-year period (December 2011-October 2014). We deployed in parallel 3 qualitative data collection methods: (1) structured observation (90+ hours, 10 sites); (2) document analysis (n > 100); and (3) semi-structured interviews (n = 41) and conducted iterative thematic analysis in which findings from each method cross-informed subsequent data collection. Thematic analysis was guided by a conceptual model and applied deductive and inductive codes. There was substantial variation in protocols for distributing and returning FIT kits both within and across clinics. Providers, clinic and laboratory staff had differing access to important data about FIT results based on clinical information system used and this affected results reporting. Communication and coordination during electronic referrals for diagnostic colonoscopy was suboptimal particularly for co-morbid patients needing anesthesia clearance. Our multi-level approach elucidated organizational deficiencies not evident by quantitative analysis alone. Findings indicate potential quality improvement intervention targets including: (1) best-practices implementation across clinics; (2) detailed communication to providers about FIT results; and (3) creation of EHR alerts to resolve pending colonoscopy referrals before they expire.
Keywords: Cancer screening; Evaluation methodology; Health services research; Information technology; Qualitative research; Quality improvement.
Similar articles
-
Barriers and facilitators of implementing a multicomponent intervention to improve faecal immunochemical test (FIT) colorectal cancer screening in primary care clinics, Alberta.BMJ Open Qual. 2024 May 27;13(2):e002686. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002686. BMJ Open Qual. 2024. PMID: 38802268 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach Program in Community Health Clinics: The STOP CRC Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Sep 1;178(9):1174-1181. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3629. JAMA Intern Med. 2018. PMID: 30083752 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Barriers associated with inadequate follow-up of abnormal fecal immunochemical test results in a safety-net system: A mixed-methods analysis.Prev Med Rep. 2022 May 18;28:101831. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101831. eCollection 2022 Aug. Prev Med Rep. 2022. PMID: 35637893 Free PMC article.
-
Monitoring the Implementation of Tobacco Cessation Support Tools: Using Novel Electronic Health Record Activity Metrics.JMIR Med Inform. 2023 Mar 2;11:e43097. doi: 10.2196/43097. JMIR Med Inform. 2023. PMID: 36862466 Free PMC article.
-
Clinic Factors Associated With Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Completion: The Difference-Making Role of Support Staff.Ann Fam Med. 2022 Mar-Apr;20(2):123-129. doi: 10.1370/afm.2772. Ann Fam Med. 2022. PMID: 35346927 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Experiential QI Activity for Residents to Improve Women's Preventive Services.PRiMER. 2021 Jul 27;5:25. doi: 10.22454/PRiMER.2021.888918. eCollection 2021. PRiMER. 2021. PMID: 34532645 Free PMC article.
-
Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening and Screening Modalities among Patients seen at Federally Qualified Health Centers Funded by the United States Health Resources and Services Administration.Prev Med Rep. 2025 Jan 16;50:102976. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2025.102976. eCollection 2025 Feb. Prev Med Rep. 2025. PMID: 39927130 Free PMC article.
-
Health Insurance Status as a Predictor of Mode of Colon Cancer Detection but Not Stage at Diagnosis: Implications for Early Detection.Public Health Rep. 2022 May-Jun;137(3):479-487. doi: 10.1177/0033354921999173. Epub 2021 Mar 31. Public Health Rep. 2022. PMID: 33789522 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of program scale-up on time to resolution for patients with abnormal screening mammography results.Cancer Causes Control. 2018 Oct;29(10):995-1005. doi: 10.1007/s10552-018-1074-4. Epub 2018 Aug 23. Cancer Causes Control. 2018. PMID: 30140972 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Allison J.E., Sakoda L.C., Levin T.R. Screening for colorectal neoplasms with new fecal occult blood tests: update on performance characteristics. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2007;99(19):1462–1470. - PubMed
-
- American Cancer Society American Cancer Society Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer Early Detection. 2015. http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/cid/documents/webcontent/003170-pdf.pdf
-
- American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:1004–1017. - PubMed
-
- Bazargan M., Ani C., Bazargan-Hejazi S., Baker R.S., Bastani R. Colorectal cancer screening among underserved minority population: discrepancy between physicians' recommended, scheduled, and completed tests. Patient Educ. Couns. 2009;76(2):240–247. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases