Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb;127(2):183-189.
doi: 10.1037/abn0000318.

Interpersonal stressors and negative affect in individuals with borderline personality disorder and community adults in daily life: A replication and extension

Affiliations

Interpersonal stressors and negative affect in individuals with borderline personality disorder and community adults in daily life: A replication and extension

Johanna Hepp et al. J Abnorm Psychol. 2018 Feb.

Abstract

Affective instability and interpersonal stress are key features of borderline personality disorder (BPD). They were shown to covary in the daily lives of patients in a recent ambulatory assessment study (Hepp et al., 2017) that observed comparatively larger positive associations between interpersonal stressors and negative affect in individuals with BPD than those with depressive disorders. The present study sought to replicate these findings, collecting data on hostility, sadness, fear, and rejection or disagreement events from 56 BPD and 60 community control participants for 21 days, 6 times a day. Using identical statistical procedures, the positive associations between momentary rejection/disagreement and hostility, sadness, and fear were replicated. Again replicating the original study, the rejection-hostility, rejection-sadness, and disagreement-hostility associations were significantly stronger in the BPD group. Time-lagged analyses extended the original study, revealing that rejection was associated with subsequent hostility and sadness more strongly in the BPD group, as was disagreement with subsequent hostility and fear. Though small, we argue that the observed group differences reflect meaningful pervasive responses in a daily life context. Future research should consider these when implementing affect regulation strategies that are applicable in interpersonal contexts for all individuals, but particularly those with BPD. (PsycINFO Database Record

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Illustration of the concurrent effects of momentary interpersonal stressors on negative affect, presented by group and separately for rejection and disagreement and for each of the negative affect criteria. Parameters used to generate the plot where extracted from Table 1. A ‘*’ indicates a significant difference between BPD and COM slopes.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
    1. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package (Version 1.1–7) Journal of Statistical Software. 2014;67(1):1–48.
    1. Beeney JE, Levy KN, Gatzke-Kopp LM, Hallquist MN. EEG asymmetry in borderline personality disorder and depression following rejection. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment. 2014;5(2):178–185. doi: 10.1037/per0000032. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological) 1995;57(1):289–300.
    1. Berenson KR, Downey G, Rafaeli E, Coifman KG, Paquin NL. The rejection–rage contingency in borderline personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 2011;120(3):681–690. doi: 10.1037/a0023335. - DOI - PMC - PubMed