Do clinicians want recommendations? A multicenter study comparing evidence summaries with and without GRADE recommendations
- PMID: 29530644
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.02.026
Do clinicians want recommendations? A multicenter study comparing evidence summaries with and without GRADE recommendations
Abstract
Objectives: Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines provide recommendations to assist clinicians in decision-making and to reduce the gap between best current research evidence and clinical practice. However, some argue that providing preappraised evidence summaries alone, rather than recommendations, is more appropriate. The objective of the study is to evaluate clinicians' preferences, and understanding of the evidence and intended course of action in response to evidence summaries with and without recommendations.
Study design setting: We included practicing clinicians attending educational sessions across 10 countries. Clinicians were randomized to receive relevant clinical scenarios supported by research evidence of low or very low certainty and accompanied by either strong or weak recommendations developed with the GRADE system. Within each group, participants were further randomized to receive the recommendation plus the corresponding evidence summary or the evidence summary alone. We evaluated participants' preferences and understanding for the presentation strategy, as well as their intended course of action.
Results: One hundred eighty-nine of 219 (86%) and 201 of 248 (81%) participants preferred having recommendations accompanying evidence summaries for both strong and weak recommendations, respectively. Across all scenarios, less than half of participants correctly interpreted information provided in the evidences summaries (e.g., estimates of effect, certainty in the research evidence). The presence of a recommendation resulted in a more appropriate intended course of action for two scenarios involving strong recommendations.
Conclusion: Evidence summaries alone are not enough to impact clinicians' course of action. Clinicians clearly prefer having recommendations accompanying evidence summaries in the context of low or very low certainty of evidence (Trial registration NCT02006017).
Keywords: Clinical practice guidelines; Clinicians' preferences; Evidence synthesis; Evidence-based medicine; GRADE; Knowledge translation.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
UpToDate adherence to GRADE criteria for strong recommendations: an analytical survey.BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 16;7(11):e018593. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018593. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 29150475 Free PMC article.
-
Multilayered and digitally structured presentation formats of trustworthy recommendations: a combined survey and randomised trial.BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 10;7(2):e011569. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011569. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 28188149 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Moving from evidence to developing recommendations in guidelines: article 11 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012 Dec;9(5):282-92. doi: 10.1513/pats.201208-064ST. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012. PMID: 23256172 Review.
-
Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome.Hum Reprod. 2018 Sep 1;33(9):1602-1618. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey256. Hum Reprod. 2018. PMID: 30052961 Free PMC article.
-
A guide for health professionals to interpret and use recommendations in guidelines developed with the GRADE approach.J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Apr;72:45-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.11.017. Epub 2016 Jan 6. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016. PMID: 26772609 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinicians' experience with infographic summaries from the BMJ Rapid Recommendations: a qualitative user-testing study among residents and interns at a large teaching hospital in Switzerland.BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 10;15(2):e083032. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083032. BMJ Open. 2025. PMID: 39929503 Free PMC article.
-
American Society of Hematology, ABHH, ACHO, Grupo CAHT, Grupo CLAHT, SAH, SBHH, SHU, SOCHIHEM, SOMETH, Sociedad Panamena de Hematología, Sociedad Peruana de Hematología, and SVH 2023 guidelines for diagnosis of venous thromboembolism and for its management in special populations in Latin America.Blood Adv. 2023 Jul 11;7(13):3005-3021. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006534. Blood Adv. 2023. PMID: 36929813 Free PMC article.
-
Similarities, reliability and gaps in assessing the quality of conduct of systematic reviews using AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS: systematic survey of nutrition reviews.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Nov 27;21(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01457-w. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021. PMID: 34837960 Free PMC article.
-
Current use of inotropes in circulatory shock.Ann Intensive Care. 2021 Jan 29;11(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13613-021-00806-8. Ann Intensive Care. 2021. PMID: 33512597 Free PMC article.
-
From gaps to guidelines: a process for providing guidance to bridge evidence gaps.Biomed Eng Online. 2025 May 3;24(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12938-025-01385-6. Biomed Eng Online. 2025. PMID: 40319264 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous