Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr;68(669):e286-e292.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X695501. Epub 2018 Mar 12.

Impact of issuing longer- versus shorter-duration prescriptions: a systematic review

Affiliations

Impact of issuing longer- versus shorter-duration prescriptions: a systematic review

Sarah King et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Long-term conditions place a substantial burden on primary care services, with drug therapy being a core aspect of clinical management. However, the ideal frequency for issuing repeat prescriptions for these medications is unknown.

Aim: To examine the impact of longer-duration (2-4 months) versus shorter-duration (28-day) prescriptions.

Design and setting: Systematic review of primary care studies.

Method: Scientific and grey literature databases were searched from inception until 21 October 2015. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials and observational studies that examined longer prescriptions (2-4 months) compared with shorter prescriptions (28 days) in patients with stable, chronic conditions being treated in primary care. Outcomes of interest were: health outcomes, adverse events, medication adherence, medication wastage, professional administration time, pharmacists' time and/or costs, patient experience, and patient out-of-pocket costs.

Results: From a search total of 24 876 records across all databases, 13 studies were eligible for review. Evidence of moderate quality from nine studies suggested that longer prescriptions are associated with increased medication adherence. Evidence from six studies suggested that longer prescriptions may increase medication waste, but results were not always statistically significant and were of very low quality. No eligible studies were identified that measured any of the other outcomes of interest, including health outcomes and adverse events.

Conclusion: There is insufficient evidence relating to the overall impact of differing prescription lengths on clinical and health service outcomes, although studies do suggest medication adherence may improve with longer prescriptions. UK recommendations to provide shorter prescriptions are not substantiated by the current evidence base.

Keywords: medication adherence; medication waste; prescription length; primary care; repeat prescribing; stable, chronic conditions; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Baird B, Charles A, Honeyman M, et al. Understanding pressures in general practice. London: King’s Fund; 2016. https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/default/files/field/field_publication... (accessed 21 Feb 2018)
    1. Department of Health. Repeat prescribing systems. 2007. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publication... (accessed 21 Feb 2018)
    1. Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee. Medicines wastage and 28-day prescribing guidance. London: Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee; 2007.
    1. NHS Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Clinical Commissioning Group. Repeat medication for 28 days. Cambridge: Cambridgeshire Primary Care Trust; 2009.
    1. North East Essex Clinical Commissioning Group . 28 day prescribing policy. Colchester: North East Essex Clinical Commissioning Group; 2011.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources