Impact of issuing longer- versus shorter-duration prescriptions: a systematic review
- PMID: 29530921
- PMCID: PMC5863683
- DOI: 10.3399/bjgp18X695501
Impact of issuing longer- versus shorter-duration prescriptions: a systematic review
Abstract
Background: Long-term conditions place a substantial burden on primary care services, with drug therapy being a core aspect of clinical management. However, the ideal frequency for issuing repeat prescriptions for these medications is unknown.
Aim: To examine the impact of longer-duration (2-4 months) versus shorter-duration (28-day) prescriptions.
Design and setting: Systematic review of primary care studies.
Method: Scientific and grey literature databases were searched from inception until 21 October 2015. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials and observational studies that examined longer prescriptions (2-4 months) compared with shorter prescriptions (28 days) in patients with stable, chronic conditions being treated in primary care. Outcomes of interest were: health outcomes, adverse events, medication adherence, medication wastage, professional administration time, pharmacists' time and/or costs, patient experience, and patient out-of-pocket costs.
Results: From a search total of 24 876 records across all databases, 13 studies were eligible for review. Evidence of moderate quality from nine studies suggested that longer prescriptions are associated with increased medication adherence. Evidence from six studies suggested that longer prescriptions may increase medication waste, but results were not always statistically significant and were of very low quality. No eligible studies were identified that measured any of the other outcomes of interest, including health outcomes and adverse events.
Conclusion: There is insufficient evidence relating to the overall impact of differing prescription lengths on clinical and health service outcomes, although studies do suggest medication adherence may improve with longer prescriptions. UK recommendations to provide shorter prescriptions are not substantiated by the current evidence base.
Keywords: medication adherence; medication waste; prescription length; primary care; repeat prescribing; stable, chronic conditions; systematic review.
© British Journal of General Practice 2018.
Similar articles
-
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of issuing longer versus shorter duration (3-month vs. 28-day) prescriptions in patients with chronic conditions: systematic review and economic modelling.Health Technol Assess. 2017 Dec;21(78):1-128. doi: 10.3310/hta21780. Health Technol Assess. 2017. PMID: 29268843 Free PMC article.
-
Retrospective, multicohort analysis of the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) to determine differences in the cost of medication wastage, dispensing fees and prescriber time of issuing either short (<60 days) or long (≥60 days) prescription lengths in primary care for common, chronic conditions in the UK.BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 4;7(12):e019382. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019382. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 29208621 Free PMC article.
-
Long-Term Costs and Health Consequences of Issuing Shorter Duration Prescriptions for Patients with Chronic Health Conditions in the English NHS.Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018 Jun;16(3):317-330. doi: 10.1007/s40258-018-0383-9. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018. PMID: 29532329
-
The effect of an Rx-to-OTC switch on medication prescribing patterns and utilization of physician services: the case of vaginal antifungal products.Health Serv Res. 1995 Dec;30(5):672-85. Health Serv Res. 1995. PMID: 8537226 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Changes to In-hospital Drug Formularies on Out-of-hospital Prescription Rates and Cost: A Systematic Review.Clin Ther. 2025 Mar;47(3):219-225. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.12.005. Epub 2024 Dec 31. Clin Ther. 2025. PMID: 39743429
Cited by
-
Effects of Real-time Prescription Benefit Recommendations on Patient Out-of-Pocket Costs: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Nov 1;182(11):1129-1137. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.3946. JAMA Intern Med. 2022. PMID: 36094537 Free PMC article.
-
Hypertension care during the COVID-19 pandemic in an integrated health care system.J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2023 Apr;25(4):315-325. doi: 10.1111/jch.14641. Epub 2023 Mar 14. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2023. PMID: 36919191 Free PMC article.
-
Levothyroxine prescriptions trends may indicate a downtrend in prescribing.Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2020 May 19;11:2042018820920551. doi: 10.1177/2042018820920551. eCollection 2020. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2020. PMID: 32489581 Free PMC article.
-
Hypertension treatment capacity in India by increased workforce, greater task-sharing, and extended prescription period: a modelling study.Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2022 Dec 14;10:100124. doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2022.100124. eCollection 2023 Mar. Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2022. PMID: 37383361 Free PMC article.
-
Variation in duration of repeat prescriptions: a primary care cohort study in England.Br J Gen Pract. 2025 Jun 26;75(756):e448-e456. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2024.0326. Print 2025 Jul. Br J Gen Pract. 2025. PMID: 39947663 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Baird B, Charles A, Honeyman M, et al. Understanding pressures in general practice. London: King’s Fund; 2016. https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/default/files/field/field_publication... (accessed 21 Feb 2018)
-
- Department of Health. Repeat prescribing systems. 2007. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publication... (accessed 21 Feb 2018)
-
- Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee. Medicines wastage and 28-day prescribing guidance. London: Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee; 2007.
-
- NHS Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Clinical Commissioning Group. Repeat medication for 28 days. Cambridge: Cambridgeshire Primary Care Trust; 2009.
-
- North East Essex Clinical Commissioning Group . 28 day prescribing policy. Colchester: North East Essex Clinical Commissioning Group; 2011.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical