Testing a frequency of exposure hypothesis in attentional bias for alcohol-related stimuli amongst social drinkers
- PMID: 29531982
- PMCID: PMC5845920
- DOI: 10.1016/j.abrep.2015.05.001
Testing a frequency of exposure hypothesis in attentional bias for alcohol-related stimuli amongst social drinkers
Abstract
Aims: To examine whether a group of social drinkers showed longer response latencies to alcohol-related stimuli than neutral stimuli and to test whether exposure to 1) an alcohol-related environment and 2) consumption related cues influenced the interference from alcohol-related stimuli.
Methods: A 2 × 2 × 2 × 5 factorial design with Exposure Group (high, low) and Consumption Group (high, low) as between-participant factors and Word Type (alcohol, neutral) and Block (1-5) as within-participant factors was used. Forty-three undergraduate university students, 21 assigned to a high exposure group and 22 to a low exposure group, took part in the experiment. Exposure Group was defined according to whether or not participants currently worked in a bar or pub. Consumption Group was defined according to a median split on a quantity-frequency measure derived from two questions of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) questionnaire. A modified computerised Stroop colour naming test was used to measure response latencies.
Results: Exposure and consumption factors interacted to produce greater interference from alcohol-related stimuli. In particular, the low consumption group showed interference from alcohol-related stimuli only in the high exposure condition. Exposure did not affect the magnitude of interference in the high consumption group.
Conclusions: Attentional bias is dependent upon exposure to distinct types of alcohol-related cues.
Keywords: Attentional bias; Cues; Exposure; Social drinkers.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Selective attentional bias to alcohol related stimuli in problem drinkers and non-problem drinkers.Addiction. 2001 Feb;96(2):285-95. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.96228512.x. Addiction. 2001. PMID: 11182874
-
Alcohol-related attentional bias in a gaze contingency task: Comparing appetitive and non-appetitive cues.Addict Behav. 2019 Mar;90:312-317. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.11.034. Epub 2018 Nov 24. Addict Behav. 2019. PMID: 30502741
-
Attentional bias for alcohol-related stimuli among belief based and non-belief based non-drinkers.Eur Addict Res. 2013;19(6):299-302. doi: 10.1159/000348426. Epub 2013 Apr 30. Eur Addict Res. 2013. PMID: 23635664
-
Where's the wine? Heavy social drinkers show attentional bias towards alcohol in a visual conjunction search task.Addiction. 2020 Sep;115(9):1650-1659. doi: 10.1111/add.14997. Epub 2020 Mar 7. Addiction. 2020. PMID: 32003522
-
Interference in the alcohol Stroop task with college student binge drinkers.J Behav Health. 2013;2(2):112-119. doi: 10.5455/jbh.20130224082728. J Behav Health. 2013. PMID: 25328802 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Exploring the alcohol-behaviour link: Myopic self-enhancement in the absence of alcohol consumption as a function of past alcohol use.Addict Behav Rep. 2016 Jul 28;4:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2016.07.002. eCollection 2016 Dec. Addict Behav Rep. 2016. PMID: 29511722 Free PMC article.
-
Patterns of implicit and explicit identity as a vegan or vegetarian in predicting healthy orthorexia and orthorexia nervosa.Eat Weight Disord. 2025 Mar 18;30(1):27. doi: 10.1007/s40519-025-01734-3. Eat Weight Disord. 2025. PMID: 40100515 Free PMC article.
-
Light social drinkers are more distracted by irrelevant information from an induced attentional bias than heavy social drinkers.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018 Oct;235(10):2967-2978. doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-4987-4. Epub 2018 Aug 18. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018. PMID: 30121707
-
Smells like inhibition: The effects of olfactory and visual alcohol cues on inhibitory control.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2016 Apr;233(8):1331-7. doi: 10.1007/s00213-016-4221-1. Epub 2016 Mar 16. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2016. PMID: 26983413 Free PMC article.
-
Age-related differences in alcohol attention bias: a cross-sectional study.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018 Aug;235(8):2387-2393. doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-4935-3. Epub 2018 Jun 9. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018. PMID: 29947915
References
-
- Albery I.P., Sharma D., Niazi A., Moss A.C. Theoretical perspectives and approaches. In: Munafò M., Albery I.P., editors. Cognition and addiction. Oxford University Press; Oxford: 2006. pp. 1–29.
-
- Attwood A.S., O'Sullivan H., Leonards U., Mackintosh B., Munafò M. Attentional bias training and cue reactivity in cigarette smokers. Addiction. 2008;103:1875–1882. - PubMed
-
- Bauer D., Cox W.M. Alcohol-related words are distracting to both alcohol abusers and non-abusers in the Stroop color-naming task. Addiction. 1998;93:1539–1542. - PubMed
-
- Bruce G., Jones B. A pictorial Stroop paradigm reveals an alcohol attentional bias in heavier as compared to lighter social drinkers. Journal of Psychopharmacology. 2004;18:527–533. - PubMed
-
- Bruce G., Jones B. Methods, measures, and findings of attentional bias in substance use, abuse, and dependence. In: Wiers R.W., Stacy A.W., editors. Handbook of implicit cognition and addiction. 2006. pp. 135–150.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources