Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 13;10(3):126.
doi: 10.3390/v10030126.

Development and Testing of a Method for Validating Chemical Inactivation of Ebola Virus

Affiliations

Development and Testing of a Method for Validating Chemical Inactivation of Ebola Virus

Kendra J Alfson et al. Viruses. .

Abstract

Complete inactivation of infectious Ebola virus (EBOV) is required before a sample may be removed from a Biosafety Level 4 laboratory. The United States Federal Select Agent Program regulations require that procedures used to demonstrate chemical inactivation must be validated in-house to confirm complete inactivation. The objective of this study was to develop a method for validating chemical inactivation of EBOV and then demonstrate the effectiveness of several commonly-used inactivation methods. Samples containing infectious EBOV (Zaire ebolavirus) in different matrices were treated, and the sample was diluted to limit the cytopathic effect of the inactivant. The presence of infectious virus was determined by assessing the cytopathic effect in Vero E6 cells. Crucially, this method did not result in a loss of infectivity in control samples, and we were able to detect less than five infectious units of EBOV (Zaire ebolavirus). We found that TRIzol LS reagent and RNA-Bee inactivated EBOV in serum; TRIzol LS reagent inactivated EBOV in clarified cell culture media; TRIzol reagent inactivated EBOV in tissue and infected Vero E6 cells; 10% neutral buffered formalin inactivated EBOV in tissue; and osmium tetroxide vapors inactivated EBOV on transmission electron microscopy grids. The methods described herein are easily performed and can be adapted to validate inactivation of viruses in various matrices and by various chemical methods.

Keywords: Ebola virus; chemical inactivation; cytopathic effect; limit of detection; viability testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cleaveland S., Laurenson M.K., Taylor L.H. Diseases of humans and their domestic mammals: Pathogen characteristics, host range and the risk of emergence. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2001;356:991–999. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2001.0889. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Woolhouse M.E.J., Gowtage-Sequeria S. Host range and emerging and reemerging pathogens. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2005;11:1842–1847. doi: 10.3201/eid1112.050997. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Feldmann H., Sanchez A., Geisbert T.W. Filoviridae: Marburg and Ebola viruses. Fields Virol. 2013;14:145–150.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Division of Select Agents and Toxins. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Services. Agriculture Select Agent Services Guidance on the Inactivation or Removal of Select Agents or Toxins for Future Use. [(accessed on 22 December 2017)]; Available online: https://www.selectagents.gov/resources/Inactivation_Guidance.pdf.
    1. Blow J.A., Dohm D.J., Negley D.L., Mores C.N. Virus inactivation by nucleic acid extraction reagents. J. Virol. Methods. 2004;119:195–198. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2004.03.015. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources