Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 13;18(1):72.
doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0761-z.

Performance of a brief geriatric evaluation compared to a comprehensive geriatric assessment for detection of geriatric syndromes in family medicine: a prospective diagnostic study

Affiliations

Performance of a brief geriatric evaluation compared to a comprehensive geriatric assessment for detection of geriatric syndromes in family medicine: a prospective diagnostic study

Yolanda K Mueller et al. BMC Geriatr. .

Abstract

Background: Geriatric syndromes are rarely detected in family medicine. Within the AGE program (active geriatric evaluation), a brief assessment tool (BAT) designed for family physicians (FP) was developed and its diagnostic performance estimated by comparison to a comprehensive geriatric assessment.

Methods: This prospective diagnostic study was conducted in four primary care sites in Switzerland. Participants were aged at least 70 years and attending a routine appointment with their physician, without previous documented geriatric assessment. Participants were assessed by their family physicians using the BAT, and by a geriatriciant who performed a comprehensive geriatric assessment within the following two-month period (reference standard). Both the BAT and the full assessment targeted eight geriatric syndromes: cognitive impairment, mood impairment, urinary incontinence, visual impairment, hearing loss, undernutrition, osteoporosis and gait and balance impairment. Diagnostic accuracy of the BAT was estimated in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values; secondary outcomes were measures of feasibility, in terms of added consultation time and comprehensiveness in applying the BAT items.

Results: Prevalence of the geriatric syndromes in participants (N=85, 46 (54.1%) women, mean age 78 years (SD 6))ranged from 30.0% (malnutrition and cognitive impairment) to 71.0% (visual impairment), with a median number of 3 syndromes (IQR 2 to 4) per participant. Sensitivity of the BAT ranged from 25.0% for undernutrition (95%CI 9.8% - 46.7%) to 82.1% for hearing impairment (95%CI 66.5% - 92.5%), while specificity ranged from 45.8% for visual impairment (95%CI 25.6-67.2) to 87.7% for undernutrition (76.3% to 94.9%). Finally, most negative predictive values (NPV) were between 73.5% and 84.1%, excluding visual impairment with a NPV of 50.0%. Family physicians reported BAT use as per instructions for 76.7% of the syndromes assessed.

Conclusions: Although the BAT does not replace a comprehensive geriatric assessment, it is a useful and appropriate tool for the FP to screen elderly patients for most geriatric syndromes.

Trial registration: The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov on February 20, 2013 ( NCT01816087 ).

Keywords: Brief geriatric evaluation; Diagnosis; Family medicine; Geriatric syndrome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients gave written informed consent. The study was approved on the 19th of October 2012 by the Research Ethics Commission of the Canton of Vaud, Switzerland (number 287/2012), and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT01816087).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: no support from any organization for the submitted work; no financial relationship with any organizations which might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient flow, AGE2 study. BAT = Brief assessment tool; *: One patient assessed under 70 years, who had reached 70 at the time of the geriatric assessment

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cesari M, Marzetti E, Thiem U, Perez-Zepeda MU, Abellan Van Kan G, Landi F, Petrovic M, Cherubini A, Bernabei R. The geriatric management of frailty as paradigm of “The end of the disease era”. European journal of internal medicine. 2016;31:11–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2016.03.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tinetti ME, Fried T. The end of the disease era. Am J Med. 2004;116(3):179–185. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.09.031. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tinetti ME, Inouye SK, Gill TM, Doucette JT. Shared risk factors for falls, incontinence, and functional dependence. Unifying the approach to geriatric syndromes. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association. 1995;273(17):1348–1353. doi: 10.1001/jama.1995.03520410042024. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Inouye SK, Studenski S, Tinetti ME, Kuchel GA. Geriatric Syndromes: Clinical, Research, and Policy Implications of a Core Geriatric Concept. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55(5):780–791. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01156.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosso AL, Eaton CB, Wallace R, Gold R, Stefanick ML, Ockene JK, Curb JD, Michael YL. Geriatric syndromes and incident disability in older women: results from the women's health initiative observational study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013;61(3):371–379. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12147. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data