Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr;141(4):e20172699.
doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-2699. Epub 2018 Mar 13.

Development and Validation of a Novel Pediatric Appendicitis Risk Calculator (pARC)

Anupam B Kharbanda  1 , Gabriela Vazquez-Benitez  2 , Dustin W Ballard  3 , David R Vinson  3 , Uli K Chettipally  3 , Mamata V Kene  3 , Steven P Dehmer  2 , Richard G Bachur  4 , Peter S Dayan  5 , Nathan Kuppermann  6 , Patrick J O'Connor  2 , Elyse O Kharbanda  2
Affiliations

Development and Validation of a Novel Pediatric Appendicitis Risk Calculator (pARC)

Anupam B Kharbanda et al. Pediatrics. 2018 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: We sought to develop and validate a clinical calculator that can be used to quantify risk for appendicitis on a continuous scale for patients with acute abdominal pain.

Methods: The pediatric appendicitis risk calculator (pARC) was developed and validated through secondary analyses of 3 distinct cohorts. The derivation sample included visits to 9 pediatric emergency departments between March 2009 and April 2010. The validation sample included visits to a single pediatric emergency department from 2003 to 2004 and 2013 to 2015. Variables evaluated were as follows: age, sex, temperature, nausea and/or vomiting, pain duration, pain location, pain with walking, pain migration, guarding, white blood cell count, and absolute neutrophil count. We used stepwise regression to develop and select the best model. Test performance of the pARC was compared with the Pediatric Appendicitis Score (PAS).

Results: The derivation sample included 2423 children, 40% of whom had appendicitis. The validation sample included 1426 children, 35% of whom had appendicitis. The final pARC model included the following variables: sex, age, duration of pain, guarding, pain migration, maximal tenderness in the right-lower quadrant, and absolute neutrophil count. In the validation sample, the pARC exhibited near perfect calibration and a high degree of discrimination (area under the curve: 0.85; 95% confidence interval: 0.83 to 0.87) and outperformed the PAS (area under the curve: 0.77; 95% confidence interval: 0.75 to 0.80). By using the pARC, almost half of patients in the validation cohort could be accurately classified as at <15% risk or ≥85% risk for appendicitis, whereas only 23% would be identified as having a comparable PAS of <3 or >8.

Conclusions: In our validation cohort of patients with acute abdominal pain, the pARC accurately quantified risk for appendicitis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose. The funding agencies took no part in data analysis, interpretation, or manuscript preparation. No person received any honorarium or other payment to produce this manuscript. This article was written by Dr Anupam Kharbanda, and all authors take full responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of data analysis.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Calibration plot of the pARC and PAS comparison (n = 1426).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Comparison of the pARC and PAS in the validation sample (n = 1426). The AUC for the PAS was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.75 to 0.80). The AUC for the pARC was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.83 to 0.87).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Comparison of the pARC and PAS based on predicted risk of appendicitis in the validation sample (n = 1426).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Barrett ML, Hines AL, Andrews RM. Trends in Rates of Perforated Appendix, 2001-2010: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Brief #159. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2013
    1. Shah SR, Sinclair KA, Theut SB, Johnson KM, Holcomb GW III, St Peter SD. Computed tomography utilization for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children decreases with a diagnostic algorithm. Ann Surg. 2016;264(3):474–481 - PubMed
    1. Santillanes G, Simms S, Gausche-Hill M, et al. . Prospective evaluation of a clinical practice guideline for diagnosis of appendicitis in children. Acad Emerg Med. 2012;19(8):886–893 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Depinet H, von Allmen D, Towbin A, Hornung R, Ho M, Alessandrini E. Risk stratification to decrease unnecessary diagnostic imaging for acute appendicitis. Pediatrics. 2016;138(3):e20154031. - PubMed
    1. Kharbanda AB, Madhok M, Krause E, et al. . Implementation of electronic clinical decision support for pediatric appendicitis. Pediatrics. 2016;137(5):e20151745. - PubMed

Publication types