Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 7:11:1178633718758023.
doi: 10.1177/1178633718758023. eCollection 2018.

Recent Progress for the Effective Prevention and Treatment of Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection

Affiliations

Recent Progress for the Effective Prevention and Treatment of Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection

Isobel Ramsay et al. Infect Dis (Auckl). .

Abstract

Recurrence occurs in approximately 25% of all cases of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) and poses a unique clinical challenge. Traditionally, treatment options of CDI have been limited to regimes of established antibiotics (eg, pulsed/tapered vancomycin) but faecal transplantation is emerging as a useful alternative. In recent years, promising new strategies have emerged for effective prevention of recurrent CDI (rCDI) including new antimicrobials (eg, fidaxomicin) and monoclonal antibodies (eg, bezlotoxumab). Despite promising progress in this area, obstacles remain for making the best use of these resources due to uncertainty over patient selection. This commentary describes the current epidemiology of rCDI, its clinical impact and risk factors, some of the measures used for treating and preventing rCDI, and some of the emerging treatment options. It then describes some of the obstacles that need to be overcome.

Keywords: Recurrent Clostridium difficile infection; bezlotoxumab; faecal microbiota transplantation; fidaxomicin; risk factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests:The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Karas JA, Enoch DA, Aliyu SH. A review of mortality due to Clostridium difficile infection. J Infect. 2010;61:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2010.03.025. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Musher DM, Aslam S, Logan N, et al. Relatively poor outcome after treatment of Clostridium difficile colitis with metronidazole. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40:1586–1590. doi:10.1086/430311. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ma GK, Brensinger CM, Wu Q, Lewis JD. Increasing incidence of multiply recurrent Clostridium difficile infection in the United States. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167:152–158. doi:10.7326/M16-2733. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Debast SB, Bauer MP, Kuijper EJ; European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. European society of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases: update of the treatment guidance document for Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20:1–26. doi:10.1111/1469-0691.12418. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Louie TTJ, Miller MA, Mullane KMK, et al. Fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:422–431. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0910812. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources