Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb 27:5:27.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00027. eCollection 2018.

Successful Application of the Gamma-Interferon Assay in a Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program: The French Bullfighting Herd Experience

Affiliations

Successful Application of the Gamma-Interferon Assay in a Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program: The French Bullfighting Herd Experience

Nicolas Keck et al. Front Vet Sci. .

Abstract

In the French Camargue region, where bovine tuberculosis had been enzootic for several years in bullfighting cattle herds, the gamma-interferon (IFN) assay was used since 2003 in parallel with the intradermal test in order to increase overall disease detection sensitivity in infected herds. This study presents the results of a field-evaluation of the assay during a 10-year period (2004-2014) of disease control and surveillance program and explores the particular pattern of IFN assay results in bullfight herds in comparison to cattle from other regions of France. The low sensitivity [59.2% (50.6; 67.3)] of IFN assay using the tuberculin stimulation could be related to the poor gamma-IFN production from bullfight cattle blood cells which is significantly lower than in animals of conventional breeds. The characteristics of the assay were progressively adapted to the epidemiological situation and the desired strategic applications. Data analysis with a receiver operating characteristic curve based on a simple S/P value algorithm allowed for the determination of a new cutoff adapted for a global screening, giving a high specificity of 99.9% results and a high accuracy of the assay. Having regularly risen to above 5% since 2005, with a peak around 10% in 2010, the annual incidence dropped to under 1% in 2014. The positive predictive value relative to the bacteriological confirmation evolved during the years, from 33% in 2009 to 12% during the last screening period, a normal trend in a context of decreasing prevalence. The estimated rate of false-positive reactions during screening campaigns was 0.67%, confirming the high specificity of the test, measured in bTB negative herds, in this epidemiological context. The proportion of false-positive reactions decreased with the age and was higher in males than in females. Although these results indicate that the IFN assay is accurate in the field, it also emphasizes great differences between interferon quantities produced by bullfight cattle blood samples compared to those of classical bovine breeds, which underlines the necessity to adapt the algorithms and combinations of the assay according to local epidemiological contexts.

Keywords: bovine tuberculosis; eradication; field performances; gamma-interferon assay; screening; strategic use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of optical density (OD) values for PPDB antigen in two infected populations: bullfighting (N = 142) and conventional cattle (N = 44). The upper lines in the boxes represent the 75th percentile (P75), the middle line represents the median (P50), and the lower line in the box represents the 25th percentile (P25). The ends of the whiskers represent minimum and maximum OD values.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve established by using the S/P quantitative value.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Evolution of the apparent prevalence and incidence rates during the two global screening periods. During these periods, half of the farms was screened with IFN test (cattle over 24 months) each year, while the other half was screened with the skin test (cattle over 12 months), except during the 2011/2012 period when all farms were screened only with the skin test.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cousins DV. Mycobacterium bovis infection and control in domestic livestock. Rev Sci Tech (2001) 20:71–85.10.20506/rst.20.1.1263 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schiller I, RayWaters W, Vordermeier HM, Jemmi T, Welsh M, Keck N, et al. Bovine tuberculosis in Europe from the perspective of an officially tuberculosis free country: trade, surveillance and diagnostics. Vet Microbiol (2011) 151:153–9.10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.02.039 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Good M, Duignan A. Perspectives on the history of bovine TB and the role of tuberculin in bovine TB eradication. Vet Med Int (2011) 2011:410470.10.4061/2011/410470 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. De la Rua-Domenech R, Goodchild AT, Vordermeier HM, Hewinson RG, Christiansen KH, Clifton-Hadley RS. Ante mortem diagnosis of tuberculosis in cattle: a review of the tuberculin tests, γ-interferon assay and other ancillary diagnostic techniques. Res Vet Sci (2006) 81:190–210.10.1016/j.rvsc.2005.11.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nuñez-Garcia J, Downs SH, Parry JE, Abernethy DA, Broughan JM, Cameron AR, et al. Meta-analyses of the sensitivity and specificity of ante-mortem and post-mortem diagnostic tests for bovine tuberculosis in the UK and Ireland. Prev Vet Med (2017).10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.02.017 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources