Is Inspiring Group Members an Effective Predictor of Social Dominance in Early Adolescence? Direct and Moderated Effects of Behavioral Strategies, Social Skills, and Gender on Resource Control and Popularity
- PMID: 29536330
- PMCID: PMC6105195
- DOI: 10.1007/s10964-018-0830-9
Is Inspiring Group Members an Effective Predictor of Social Dominance in Early Adolescence? Direct and Moderated Effects of Behavioral Strategies, Social Skills, and Gender on Resource Control and Popularity
Abstract
Dominance in the peer group is important for adolescents. Resource Control Theory posits that both coercive and prosocial (positively assertive) strategies are associated with dominance. Combining Resource Control Theory with Socioanalytic Theory on personality, we hypothesized that inspiring group members would be an additional effective strategy. This study examined whether the three behavioral strategies and two types of social skills (social competence and manipulation) predicted dominance (resource control and popularity). Participants were 619 Dutch adolescents (Mage = 13.1; 47% female) in the first grade of secondary school. They completed peer reports (behavioral strategies and dominance) and self-reports (social skills). Only inspirational and coercive strategies substantially predicted dominance. Main effects of social skills emerged. Moderation between strategies and social skills was only observed for girls (e.g., coercive strategy use was associated with more popularity for girls with higher levels of social manipulation skills). This study furthered our understanding of the predictors of dominance in adolescence by including inspirational behavior and examining prosocial and antisocial skills.
Keywords: Inspirational behavior; Popularity; Resource control; Resource control strategies; Social dominance; Social skills.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Figures
References
-
- Andreou E. Social preference, perceived popularity and social intelligence: Relations to overt and relational aggression. School Psychology International. 2006;27:339–351. doi: 10.1177/0143034306067286. - DOI
-
- Brown BB. Popularity in peer group perspective. The role of status in adolescent peer systems. In: Cillessen AHN, Schwartz D, Mayeux L, editors. Popularity in the peer system. New York, NY: Guilford; 2011. pp. 165–192.
-
- Brown BB, Larson J. Peer relationships in adolescence. In: Lerner RM, Steinberg L, editors. Handbook of adolescent psychology. 3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2009. pp. 74–103.
-
- Bukowski WM, Cillessen AHN, Velásquez AM. Peer ratings. In: Laursen B, Little TD, Card NA, editors. Handbook of developmental research methods. New York, NY: Guilford; 2012. pp. 211–228.
-
- Buss, D. M. (1996). The evolutionary psychology of human social strategies. In E. T. Higgens & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 3–71). New York, NY: Guilford.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical