Natural suppressor (NS) activity from murine neonatal spleen is responsive to IFN-gamma

Abstract

Natural suppressor (NS) cell activity is the ability of apparently unprimed "null" cells to nonspecifically suppress immune responses. Previously we have shown that NS cell activity from the spleens of mice undergoing chronic graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) is enhanced in vitro by activated T cell signals (e.g., Con A supernatant [CAS]). Here we asked if the naturally occurring suppressor activity found in the neonatal mouse spleen is caused by NS cells, and if so whether this NS activity is also responsive to T cell signals. Finally, we wanted to identify the material in the CAS to which the NS cells respond. Spleen cells from (BALB/c X B10.D2)F1 neonates contain potent, genetically unrestricted suppressor activity toward normal mitogen responses. The cells responsible for this suppression are nonadherent, Thy-, Ig- and are thus by definition NS cells. Neonatal spleen NS cells suppress the indicator Con A response of all mouse strains tested, but their behavior with regard to LPS responses is different. They significantly inhibit the indicator LPS response of allogeneic strains, but are less inhibitory of LPS-stimulated syngeneic (BALB/c X B10.D2)F1 and parental strains. However, the addition of CAS to these latter cultures enhances the NS inhibition of the LPS response to the level of suppression seen with a Con A response. Two lymphokines were able to replace the CAS. Recombinant interferon-gamma (rIFN-gamma) closely mimics the activity found with whole CAS, with low concentrations (1 U/well) being capable of enhancing the neonatal NS activity to near-maximal levels. Recombinant interleukin 2 (rIL 2) is also capable of stimulating the neonatal NS activity to near maximum. However, the rIL 2 must be added at much higher concentrations, taking greater than 50 U/well to get maximum activation of NS suppression. The addition of anti-IFN-gamma antiserum to these LPS suppression assays removes the ability of CAS to activate the neonatal NS cells. Anti-IFN-gamma antiserum also removes the ability of rIL 2 as well as rIFN-gamma to activate the NS cells. It thus appears that the rIL 2 is working by its ability to stimulate IFN-gamma production. Anti-IFN-gamma also removes the ability of the neonatal NS cells to suppress a Con A response. Therefore, it appears that neonatal splenic NS cells respond to, and are activated by, IFN-gamma to carry out their suppressive activity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)