Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 14;13(3):e0193305.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193305. eCollection 2018.

Allometry of individual reproduction and defense in eusocial colonies: A comparative approach to trade-offs in social sponge-dwelling Synalpheus shrimps

Affiliations

Allometry of individual reproduction and defense in eusocial colonies: A comparative approach to trade-offs in social sponge-dwelling Synalpheus shrimps

Sarah L Bornbusch et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Eusociality, one of the most complex forms of social organization, is thought to have evolved in several animal clades in response to competition for resources and reproductive opportunities. Several species of snapping shrimp in the genus Synalpheus, the only marine organisms known to exhibit eusociality, form colonies characterized by high reproductive skew, and aggressive territoriality coupled with cooperative defense. In eusocial Synalpheus colonies, individual reproduction is limited to female 'queens', whose fecundity dictates colony growth. Given that individual reproduction and defense are both energetically costly, individual and colony fitness likely depend on the optimal allocation of resources by these reproducing individuals towards these potentially competing demands. Synalpheus species, however, display varying degrees of eusociality, suggesting that reproducing females have adopted different strategies for allocation among reproduction and defense. Here, we use structural equation modeling to characterize the relationships between the allometry of queen reproductive capacity and defensive weaponry, and colony size in six eusocial Synalpheus species, estimating trade-offs between reproduction and defense. We document strong trade-offs between mass of the fighting claw (defense) and egg number (reproduction) in queens from weakly eusocial species, while the trade-off is reduced or absent in those from strongly eusocial species. These results suggest that in less cooperative species, intra-colony conflict selects for queen retention of weapons that have significant costs to fecundity, while reproducing females from highly eusocial species, i.e., those with a single queen, have been able to reduce the cost of weapons as a result of protection by other colony members.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Allometric measurements for (a) carapace length and (b) chela length on preserved, sponge-dwelling shrimp. Measurements in millimeters were taken along the line shown using ImageJ.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Conceptual path diagram showing the hypothesized directional relationships among variables.
The sign of the proposed relationship is given and color coded: (positive/negative, +/-, black/red).
Fig 3
Fig 3. Results of structural equation models with variance explained (R2) for each pathway.
The sign of the correlation is color coded (positive/negative, +/-, black/red) and arrow size is scaled by strength of the standardized path coefficients (S1 Table). Solid paths are significant (p ≤0.05) and dotted paths are non-significant.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Relationship between eusociality index and bivariate correlation of chela mass and egg number.
Recovered from the structural equation models representing the trade-off between reproduction (egg number) and defense (chela mass). Error bars represent +/- 1 standard error of the mean. The dashed line is the (non-significant) predicted fit from a simple linear regression.

References

    1. Szathmary E, Smith JM. The major evolutionary transitions. Nature. 1995;374(6519):227 doi: 10.1038/374227a0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wilson EO. The Insect Socities Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, Harvard University Press [Distributed by Oxford University Press; 1971.
    1. Andersson M. The Evolution of Eusociality. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1984;15(7310):165–89.
    1. Hughes WOH, Oldroyd BP, Beekman M, Ratnieks FLW. Ancestral monogamy shows kin selection is key to the evolution of eusociality. Science (80-). 2008;320(5880):1213–6. doi: 10.1126/science.1156108 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hamilton WD. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. J Theor Biol. 1964;7(1):17–52. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources