Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan;9(1):174-184.
doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1632396. Epub 2018 Mar 14.

Focus Section Health IT Usability: Applying a Task-Technology Fit Model to Adapt an Electronic Patient Portal for Patient Work

Focus Section Health IT Usability: Applying a Task-Technology Fit Model to Adapt an Electronic Patient Portal for Patient Work

Sana B Ali et al. Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: Although electronic patient portals are offered by most health care organizations, poor usability and poor fit to patient needs may pose barriers to adoption. We collaborated with an academic hospital to conduct iterative user evaluation of a newly deployed portal designed to deliver inpatient data upon hospital discharge.

Methods: Three evaluators applied heuristic usability evaluation and conducted 23 individual user testing sessions with patients with chronic disease or managing the care of family members with chronic disease. Evaluation and development/improvement were conducted iteratively. User testing and analysis of qualitative data were both conducted from the perspective of a task-technology fit framework, to assess the degree of fit between the portal and patient work.

Results: Ability to complete health information management tasks, perceived usability, and positive comments from users improved over the course of the iterative development. However, patients still encountered significant difficulties accomplishing certain tasks such as setting up proxy accounts. The problems were most severe when patients did not start with a clear understanding of tasks that they could accomplish. In exploring the portal, novice users frequently described anecdotes from their own medical history or constructed fictional narratives about a hypothetical patient.

Conclusion: Chronic illness imposes a significant workload on patients, and applying a task-technology framework for evaluation of a patient portal helped improve the portal's fit to patient needs. However, it also revealed that patients often lack a clear understanding of tasks that would help them accomplish personal health information management. Portal developers may need to educate patients about types of patient work involving medical centers, in a way that developers of clinical information systems do not need to do. An approach to doing this might be to provide narratives about hypothetical patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Adapted from Ammenwerth's fit between individuals, task, and technology (FITT) model, our conceptual model links electronic patient portal adoption with fit among personal health information management (PHIM) tasks, patients, and the portal. In this study, we assessed five PHIM tasks and collected information about patients, the portal, patient-task fit, patient-portal fit, and task-portal fit.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Heuristic evaluation, performed by the researchers, showed gains in some domains as well as losses in others. Losses were largely attributable to the introduction of new functionality and reorganization during the development phase.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Patients' ability to complete several personal health information management (PHIM) tasks improved after portal redesign.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Blumenthal D. Stimulating the adoption of health information technology. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(15):1477–1479. - PubMed
    1. Ancker J S, Hafeez B, Kaushal R. Socioeconomic disparities in adoption of personal health records over time. Am J Manag Care. 2016;22(08):539–540. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ancker J S, Silver M, Kaushal R. Rapid growth in use of personal health records in New York, 2012-2013. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29(06):850–854. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lin C T, Wittevrongel L, Moore L, Beaty B L, Ross S E. An Internet-based patient-provider communication system: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7(04):e47. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ammenwerth E, Schnell-Inderst P, Hoerbst A. The impact of electronic patient portals on patient care: a systematic review of controlled trials. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(06):e162. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types