Introduction of clerking pro forma for surgical spinal patients at the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust (London): an audit cycle
- PMID: 29540450
- DOI: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2017-135498
Introduction of clerking pro forma for surgical spinal patients at the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust (London): an audit cycle
Abstract
As a tertiary referral centre of spinal surgery, the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital (RNOH) handles hundreds of spinal cases a year, often with complex pathology and complex care needs. Despite this, issues were raised at the RNOH following lack of sufficient documentation of preoperative and postoperative clinical findings in spinal patients undergoing major surgery. This is not in keeping with guidelines provided by the Royal College of Surgeons. The authors believe that a standardised clerking pro forma for surgical spinal patients admitted to RNOH would improve the quality of care provided. Therefore, the use of a standard clerking pro forma for all surgical spinal patients could be a useful tool enabling improvements in patients care and safety in keeping with General Medical Council/National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines. An audit (with closure of loop) looking into the quality of the preoperative and postoperative clinical documentation for surgical spinal patients was carried out at the RNOH in 2016 (retrospective case note audit comparing preintervention and postintervention documentation standards). Our standardised pro forma allows clinicians to best utilise their time and standardises examination to be compared in a temporal manner during the patients admission and care. It is the authors understanding that this work is a unique study looking at the quality of the admission clerking for surgical spinal patients. Evidently, there remains work to be done for the widespread utilisation of the pro forma. Early results suggest that such a pro forma can significantly improve the documentation in admission clerking with improvements in the quality of care for patients.
Keywords: audit; quality in health care; spine.
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
The use of a pro forma to improve quality in clerking vascular surgery patients.BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2016 Mar 3;5(1):u210642.w4280. doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u210642.w4280. eCollection 2016. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2016. PMID: 27418964 Free PMC article.
-
Improving paediatric tuberculosis and HIV clinical record keeping: the use of audit and a structured pro forma in a South African regional level hospital.Trop Doct. 2014 Apr;44(2):96-9. doi: 10.1177/0049475513515477. Epub 2013 Dec 5. Trop Doct. 2014. PMID: 24311547
-
Enhancing The Quality Of Emergency Admission Clerking In Neurosurgery: A Comparative Study Of Traditional Methods Versus A Surgical Clerking Proforma.J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2024 Oct-Dec;36(4):730-733. doi: 10.55519/JAMC-04-13720. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2024. PMID: 40121632
-
Do medical admission pro formas -improve the completeness of documentation? A multisite observational study.Future Healthc J. 2018 Jun;5(2):121-125. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.5-2-121. Future Healthc J. 2018. PMID: 31098546 Free PMC article.
-
Improving quality of care through national clinical audit.Future Hosp J. 2016 Oct;3(3):203-206. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.3-3-203. Future Hosp J. 2016. PMID: 31098227 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Dorsally displaced distal radius fractures: introduction of Pacetti's line as radiological measurement to predict dorsal fracture displacement.Acta Biomed. 2021 Jul 1;92(3):e2021200. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92i3.11392. Acta Biomed. 2021. PMID: 34212906 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials