Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Feb;60(Suppl 4):S575-S582.
doi: 10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_27_18.

Planning research in psychosocial interventions

Affiliations
Review

Planning research in psychosocial interventions

Atul Ambekar et al. Indian J Psychiatry. 2018 Feb.

Abstract

A number of research designs have been used to study the efficacy of psychosocial interventions in addictive disorders, including open label studies and randomised controlled trials. Only through a rigorously conducted research, evidence base for effectiveness of a psychosocial intervention can be established. However, research on these interventions are fraught with a number of challenges. It is imperative for researchers to ask appropriate research questions based on sound theoretical understanding of psychiatric disorders, psychosocial interventions and research designs. This would help in choosing the less studied, relevant areas for in depth study as well as in using pragmatic, realistic research designs. Defining intervention clearly is as crucial, as is its uniform implementation across various treatment arms. In addition, tapping the mediators, moderators and confounders of treatment using appropriate methods while assessing the factors that directly impact the outcome is important to determine actual effects of psychosocial intervention. Barriers at different stages must be gauged proactively and dealt with, wherever possible.

Keywords: Addiction; nonpharmacological management; planning addiction research; psychosocial intervention; substance use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) Perspectives on Drugs: The role of psychosocial interventions in drug treatment. Germany: Lisbon; 2016.
    1. Gates PJ, Sabioni P, Copeland J, Le Foll B, Gowing L. Psychosocial interventions for cannabis use disorder. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2016;(5) Art No: CD005336. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Budney AJ, Higgins ST, Radonovich KJ, Novy PL. Adding voucher-based incentives to coping skills and motivational enhancement improves outcomes during treatment for marijuana dependence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2000;68(6):1051–61. - PubMed
    1. Stephens RS, Roffman RA, Curtin L. Comparison of extended versus brief treatments for marijuana use. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2000;68(5):8988–908. - PubMed
    1. Copeland J, Swift W, Roffman R, Stephens R. A randomised controlled trial of brief cognitive behavioral interventions for cannabis use disorder. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2001;21(2):55–64. - PubMed