Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2018 Nov;9(6):1304-1311.
doi: 10.1111/jdi.12837. Epub 2018 Apr 19.

Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol is more informative than traditional cholesterol indices in predicting diabetes risk for women with normal glucose tolerance

Affiliations
Observational Study

Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol is more informative than traditional cholesterol indices in predicting diabetes risk for women with normal glucose tolerance

Lu Liu et al. J Diabetes Investig. 2018 Nov.

Abstract

Aims/introduction: Limited data are available regarding the performance of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL) in predicting incident diabetes. We aimed to analyze the association between non-HDL and development of diabetes, and to estimate the cut-off point of non-HDL for discriminating incident diabetes in people with normal glucose tolerance.

Materials and methods: Of 3,653 middle-aged and elderly Chinese with normal glucose tolerance at enrollment, 1,025 men and 1,805 women returned to the 3-year follow up and were involved in the final analysis. Logistic regression analysis was used to test the association between cholesterol indices and incident diabetes, and receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to identify the optimal cut-off of each cholesterol variable for incident diabetes.

Results: Non-HDL was an independent risk factor for diabetes for women, but not for men. In women, a 1-standard deviation increment in non-HDL was associated with a 1.43-fold higher risk of diabetes (95% confidence interval 1.14-1.79; P = 0.002), whereas odds ratios for total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were 1.33 (95% confidence interval 1.06-1.67; P = 0.015) and 1.30 (95% confidence interval 1.04-1.64; P = 0.024), respectively. The discriminatory power and the optimal cut-off value of non-HDL for incident diabetes increased across body mass index categories. For women with obesity, the threshold of non-HDL for screening of diabetes was estimated as 3.51 mmol/L.

Conclusions: Non-HDL had better performance than traditional cholesterol indices in predicting diabetes in women, but not in men. A body mass index-specific threshold value for a non-HDL-controlling target is required in the prevention of type 2 diabetes.

Keywords: Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; Primary prevention; Type 2 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Collaboration NCDRF . Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: a pooled analysis of 751 population‐based studies with 4.4 million participants. Lancet 2016; 387: 1513–1530. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xu Y, Wang L, He J, et al Prevalence and control of diabetes in Chinese adults. JAMA 2013; 310: 948–959. - PubMed
    1. McCarthy M. Diabetes prevention counseling is cost effective, US study finds. BMJ 2016; 352: i1769. - PubMed
    1. Ley SH, Harris SB, Mamakeesick M, et al Metabolic syndrome and its components as predictors of incident type 2 diabetes mellitus in an Aboriginal community. CMAJ 2009; 180: 617–624. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fizelova M, Miilunpohja M, Kangas AJ, et al Associations of multiple lipoprotein and apolipoprotein measures with worsening of glycemia and incident type 2 diabetes in 6607 non‐diabetic Finnish men. Atherosclerosis 2015; 240: 272–277. - PubMed

Publication types