Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul 4;9(4):293-307.
doi: 10.1080/19490976.2018.1445957. Epub 2018 May 15.

Systematic review: Gut microbiota in fecal samples and detection of colorectal neoplasms

Affiliations

Systematic review: Gut microbiota in fecal samples and detection of colorectal neoplasms

Efrat L Amitay et al. Gut Microbes. .

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer morbidity and mortality. Dysbiosis in the gut microbiota may be associated with CRC. This systematic review focuses on differences in gut microbial community between people diagnosed with CRC or adenoma and healthy individuals using fecal samples, emphasizing non-invasive fecal microbiome models for CRC early diagnosis. Nineteen studies were identified in a systematic literature search of Pubmed, Web of Science and ScienceDirect. Several bacteria were reported to differ in abundance between CRC and adenoma cases and healthy controls, with Fusobacterium the most common. Fecal multi-bacterial predictive models used to distinguish CRC patients from healthy controls had reported areas under the receiver operating curve (AUCs) in external validation populations of 0.68-0.77. Though advanced sequencing techniques could in the future complement current non-invasive methods for CRC early detection, more studies with high statistical power, comparable and reproducible methods and external validation of predictive models are needed.

Keywords: bacteria; cancer; colorectal; fecal; fusobacterium; microbiome; microbiota.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA flow diagram.

References

    1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(5):E359-86. doi:10.1002/ijc.29210. PMID:25220842. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Miller D, Bishop K, Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Yu M, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, et al.. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2013. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2016. [Available from: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2013/.
    1. Brenner H, Hoffmeister M, Stegmaier C, Brenner G, Altenhofen L, Haug U. Risk of progression of advanced adenomas to colorectal cancer by age and sex: estimates based on 840,149 screening colonoscopies. Gut. 2007;56(11):1585-9. doi:10.1136/gut.2007.122739. PMID:17591622. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hewitson P, Glasziou P, Watson E, Towler B, Irwig L. Cochrane systematic review of colorectal cancer screening using the fecal occult blood test (hemoccult): an update. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103(6):1541-9. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.01875.x. PMID:18479499. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shaukat A, Mongin SJ, Geisser MS, Lederle FA, Bond JH, Mandel JS, Church TR. Long-term mortality after screening for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(12):1106-14. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1300720. PMID:24047060. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources