Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 May;39(5):852-858.
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5591. Epub 2018 Mar 15.

Endovascular Treatment of Very Large and Giant Intracranial Aneurysms: Comparison between Reconstructive and Deconstructive Techniques-A Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Endovascular Treatment of Very Large and Giant Intracranial Aneurysms: Comparison between Reconstructive and Deconstructive Techniques-A Meta-Analysis

F Cagnazzo et al. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 May.

Abstract

Background: The safety and efficacy of reconstructive and deconstructive endovascular treatments of very large/giant intracranial aneurysms are not completely clear.

Purpose: Our aim was to compare treatment-related outcomes between these 2 techniques.

Data sources: A systematic search of 3 data bases was performed for studies published from 1990 to 2017.

Study selection: We selected series of reconstructive and deconstructive treatments with >10 patients.

Data analysis: Random-effects meta-analysis was used to analyze occlusion rates, complications, and neurologic outcomes.

Data synthesis: Thirty-nine studies evaluating 894 very large/giant aneurysms were included. Long-term occlusion of unruptured aneurysms was 71% and 93% after reconstructive and deconstructive treatments, respectively (P = .003). Among unruptured aneurysms, complications were lower after parent artery occlusion (16% versus 30%, P = .05), whereas among ruptured lesions, complications were lower after reconstructive techniques (34% versus 38%). Parent artery occlusion in the posterior circulation had higher complications compared with in the anterior circulation (36% versus 15%, P = .001). Overall, coiling yielded lower complication and occlusion rates compared with flow diverters and stent-assisted coiling. Complication rates of flow diversion were lower in the anterior circulation (17% versus 41%, P < .01). Among unruptured lesions, early aneurysm rupture (within 30 days) was slightly higher after reconstructive treatment (5% versus 0%, P = .08) and after flow diversion alone compared with flow diversion plus coiling (7% versus 0%).

Limitations: Limitations were selection and publication biases.

Conclusions: Parent artery occlusion allowed high rates of occlusion with an acceptable rate of complications for unruptured, anterior circulation aneurysms. Coiling should be preferred for posterior circulation and ruptured lesions, whereas flow diversion is relatively safe and effective for unruptured anterior circulation aneurysms.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Adeeb N, Griessenauer CJ, Shallwani H, et al. . Pipeline embolization device in treatment of 50 unruptured large and giant aneurysms. World Neurosurg 2017;105:232–37 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.05.128 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gruber A, Killer M, Bavinzski G, et al. . Clinical and angiographic results of endosaccular coiling treatment of giant and very large intracranial aneurysms: a 7-year, single-center experience. Neurosurgery 1999;45:793–803; discussion 803–04 10.1097/00006123-199910000-00013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gao X, Liang G, Li Z, et al. . A single-centre experience and follow-up of patients with endovascular coiling of large and giant intracranial aneurysms with parent artery preservation. J Clin Neurosci 2012;19:364–69 10.1016/j.jocn.2011.03.038 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clarençon F, Bonneville F, Boch AL, et al. . Parent artery occlusion is not obsolete in giant aneurysms of the ICA: experience with very-long-term follow-up. Neuroradiology 2011;53:973–82 10.1007/s00234-010-0800-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jahromi BS, Mocco J, Bang JA, et al. . Clinical and angiographic outcome after endovascular management of giant intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2008;63:662–74; discussion 674–75 10.1227/01.NEU.0000325497.79690.4C - DOI - PubMed